Call: 1995
Gerald Browne
MBChB (1992)
PGDipLaw (1994)
Inns Of Court School of Law (1995)
FLBA member
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Gerald has over 30 years of experience and has specialised exclusively in children and financial remedy work since 1999. Gerald’s medical background is also helpful where health issues feature.
Every case brings its own complexities and Gerald always explores every avenue to achieve the right outcome for his client. His experience and calm approach means he is able to reassure clients in the pressured environment of court and he always aims to communicate early and often with solicitor clients.
Over the years, Gerald has gained a great deal of knowledge in respect of financial remedy and private children law court disputes. He also accepts instructions in private FDR’s and DRA’s, providing an excellent opportunity to achieve tailored and practical solutions in difficult circumstances. Gerald is also able to take instructions under the Direct Public Access scheme.
Reputation
Gerald now has more than 30 years experience as a barrister and has practised exclusively in family law since 1999.
Expertise
Gerald has a similarly broad experience of ‘lives with’ and ‘spends time with’ children cases and, in particular, has acted in parental alienation cases, overseas and domestic relocation cases as well as in domestic abuse cases.
Gerald will help with advice and/or representation as much or as little is required whether from the very start, before proceedings even start, or meeting the client for the first time at the hearing. Gerald’s experience means that he will be able to give sound advice and representation in any situation.
Notable Cases
H v W (2026): A matrimonial finance case in which W sought financial remedy orders after an overseas divorce. H successfully defended the application on the basis that W had failed to declare a subsequent overseas remarriage.
F v GP (2026): A sensitive children case in which the biological father of one child sought ‘lives with’ orders for both children following the death of the children’s mother.
H v W (2026): A matrimonial finance case in which H represented himself. W successfully established that H was under-declaring his income and achieved an award in the terms of her open proposals.
F v M (2025): A children case in which advice and representation was provided to F, who was trying to re-instate contact with his child after failed input from ICFA within the constraints of a tight budget.
Clerks

