Adam Willoughby
Call: 2011
Adam Willoughby
Head of Sports Law & Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team
LL.B (Hons) Law, University of Hull, First Class Honours (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course, BPP Law School, Leeds (2011)
Inaugural Middle Temple Master Rose Scholarship Award (2010)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier No. 02DXD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Adam specialises in:
Employment Law
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Matrimonial Finance (with an emphasis on commercial and complex pension interests)
Adam has been described as having “an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style” who “always delivers impeccable results” (Chambers and Partners).
Reputation
Adam is head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Team and Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team. Adam is recognised within Chambers and Partners and has recently been noted as:
"Adam Willoughby is deputy head of the employment law team. He is praised for his work in complex discrimination claims, particularly involving vulnerable claimants. He offers expertise across the whole range of employment law, acting for claimants and respondents.He is a very clever chap with an excellent employment practice."
(Chambers and Partners)
"Adam’s preparation and attention to detail is always first rate. He has an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style". "He goes over and above on every case, he has an incredible manner with the clients, and he is such a kind and generous person with his time who always delivers impeccable results". "He is an approachable barrister who is thorough and diligent".
(Chambers and Partners, 2022)
Client feedback has identified Adam as an “impressive and highly effective advocate” with “exceptional analytical ability” and as “tactically very astute”. Adam is a “formidable advocate” with “exceptional intellectual ability”. His written opinions have been described as “clear, concise and thorough” and his pleadings are “consistently very good”.
Adam is also a highly sought after speaker having been invited to speak to delegations in New York, Dallas, Chicago and the UK.
Expertise
Employment
Adam is the Deputy Head of Employment Law and acts for businesses and individual clients both in the Employment Tribunal as well as in High Court commercial disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam regularly advises and represents parties to appeals before the Employment Appeal Tribunal and Court of Appeal.
Adam is highly sought after across the range of employment disputes, from unfair dismissal and discrimination cases to whistleblowing, equal pay, working time and TUPE issues. Adam also represents individuals the subject of disciplinary and regulatory proceedings.
Adam has established an excellent reputation for advising and representing professional sports clubs and athletes as well as corporate and individual clients operating in the Media and Entertainment industry in relation to disputes arising from contractual relationships and in regulatory and disciplinary matters.
Adam regularly appears in the Queen’s Bench Division and Chancery Division of the High Court in relation to litigation arising from the employment relationship and in relation to claims concerning director and shareholder responsibilities, including:
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Restrictive covenants
• Breach of confidence
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Adam is the Head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Group. He acts in a diverse range of high profile and complex cases in the High Court and before tribunals, arbitral panels as well as in disciplinary and appeals panels.
The strength of Adam’s practice lies in his existing expertise in the complimentary fields of employment, corporate and commercial law.
Adam advises and represents sports clients, including athletes, teams, clubs, agents, broadcasters, and international and national sports governing bodies in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and contractual
• Disciplinary and regulatory
• Regulatory governance
• Anti-doping
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Adam acts for a wide range of artists, performers and media personalities in disputes concerning:
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual property
• Commercial and Contract
• Licensing
• Pre-publication injunctions
• Reputation management
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Adam acts in a wide range of high value and complex disputes on behalf of claimant’s, defendants, and intervenors. Adam has established a strong reputation in representing and advising clients in the sports, media and entertainment industries as well as individuals and companies in disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam advises and represents clients in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and employment contracts
• Restrictive covenants
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of confidence
• Defamation and Privacy
• Intellectual Property
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Partnership
• Agency
• Equitable Relief
• Professional Negligence
• Trusts, both express and implied, including TOLATA claims
• Family Provision – Inheritance Act 1975 applications
• Wills, Probate & Administration of Estates
Family
Adam has particular expertise in cases which include commercial interests, complex pension arrangements and in cases concerning complex corporate structures and trusts.
Adam advises and represents clients in ancillary relief proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings. Adam is highly sought after in cases featuring overseas assets, offshore accounts, special contributions within the marriage, inherited wealth, insolvency and financial dishonesty, alongside needs-based cases.
In addition to matrimonial finance, Adam advises and represents clients in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Regulatory
Adam provides specialist advice and representation in cases concerning disciplinary and regulatory law across a wide range of sectors, including healthcare, financial services, professional services, legal services, media and sport. Adam has also appeared in several inquests at which he represented healthcare professionals accused of serious misconduct.
Adam represents clients at all stages of proceedings before disciplinary panels, statutory tribunals and before the courts, including the appellate courts. Adam understands the potential reputational damage that such proceedings can cause and so works in a client-focused manner, providing straight-forward and practical advice at the early stages of proceedings. The strength of Adam’s practice lies in his existing expertise in the complimentary fields of employment, corporate and commercial law.
Examples of Adam’s work include advising and representing clients before the General Osteopathic Council’s Professional Conduct Committee, the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, Sports Resolution UK, the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Rugby Football Union Panel, the Health and Care Professions Council and the General Medical Council’s Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service.
Notable Cases
Fatima v Family Channel Ltd & anor [2020] EWCA Civ 824
Represented appellant in her appeal to the Court of Appeal which considered the interplay between an unsuccessful application to adjourn a trial under CPR 3.1(2)(b) and a subsequent application under CPR 39.3 to set aside judgment against a non-attending party.
Tattu Manchester Ltd v Powell (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in her response to an appeal to the EAT which considered whether the Tribunal had wrongly interpreted a bonus scheme to mean pre rather than post EBIDTA figures and whether it had wrong concluded there had been a breach of contract.
Jones v. G4S Secure Solutions (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in its appeal to the EAT which considered whether there had been a dismissal of the claimant following reinstatement on a domestic appeal, considering Roberts v. West Coast Trains Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 900.
Thomas v Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the claimant in her appeal brought by the respondent in which the EAT considered whether the Tribunal had substituted its view for that of the employer in finding that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
Hunt v. DVSA (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the appellant in her appeal on the issue of whether the Tribunal erred in its findings that she was not constructively dismissal.
Featherstone Rovers v Griffin
Represented the club concerning breach of contract by a player.
Keith Deller Sports Management Limited v Adrian Jackpot Lewis Limited & Adrian Lewis
Represented Sports Agent concerning claim against a professional darts player for unpaid fees and in its defence of a counterclaim alleging breach of the agency agreement.
Other examples of Adam’s recent work includes:
Representing an RFL club in a dispute with a player who breached his playing contract by having unauthorised dealings with a competing club.
Representing a high-profile professional football player in a claim brought by his former agent in respect of unpaid commissions.
Representing an international rugby player concerning his blocked transfer to another club in Canada.
Representing a professional footballer in a claim against him by a sponsor for breach of the sponsorship agreement.
Representing a multi-national firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Represented a claimant in a petition under s. 994 Companies Act 2006 following her exclusion as a minority shareholder and deprivation of dividend payments. Relief sought was in excess of £19m.
Representing a defendant in a dispute concerning an alleged indemnity to return sales commissions.
Advising and representing an international firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Representing a nationwide motor trading company in its defence of claims of passing off, breach of trademark and copyright.
Advising and representing a high-profile professional footballer in ancillary relief proceedings which included defending the claims of an agent intervening.
Advising and representing an applicant in ancillary relief proceedings in which the key issue concerned a substantial discretionary family trust worth in excess of £30m.
Advising a national publication as to allegations of defamatory statements against a competing publication.
Advising an international food manufacturing company in the wake of public allegations of mislabelling products.
Clerks
Kerry Barker
Call: 2013 (Solicitor 2003)
Kerry Barker
B.A. (Hons), Law & Business (1998)
Admitted as a Solicitor (2003)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02CXW
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kerry Barker is a barrister who specialises in Family Law. Having previously qualified as a solicitor in 2003, Kerry practices exclusively in this area and represents clients in private law and public law matters. As a solicitor Kerry was a member of the Law Society’s Children Panel and also held her higher court advocacy rights; recognising her position as an experienced solicitor-advocate.
Since Kerry joined Broadway House Chambers’ highly-rated Family Law Team in March 2013 she has developed a busy practice exclusively in family law. As a family law specialist for over 15 years Kerry has built up extensive knowledge in all areas of family law.
Kerry is well known for providing clients with realistic and sensible advice at all stages of proceedings and for conducting hearings in a measured manner. Kerry’s friendly and approachable manner make her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
“You are a star Kerry. Your thoroughness and attention to detail is appreciated.”
(Bradford Solicitor)
Kerry has considerable experience of cases involving different cultures, which often require an interpreter.
Kerry is able to accept instructions under the Direct Access Scheme.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Public Law
Kerry acts for clients in difficult and complex cases involving non-accidental injuries, sexual abuse, domestic violence and mental health aspects, and is known for her high competence and thoroughness as an advocate in very sensitive matters at every level in the unified family jurisdiction. Kerry is also instructed by Local Authorities at all levels of public law proceedings.
Kerry Barker has a very busy public law practice which is characterised by representing parties in very complex cases where in most cases expert evidence has been relied upon. Recent cases include significant and chronic neglect, multiple fractures and bruises, and psychological/psychiatric evidence. Kerry has represented Local Authorities and parents in lengthy (10 day plus) finding of fact and final hearings.
Kerry conducts cases involving applications for care and supervision orders; contact with children in care; discharge proceedings; placement and adoption orders; and special guardianship orders. In these proceedings Kerry represents parents, grandparents, children and other interested parties in complex care proceedings. As a solicitor she was also a member of the Children Panel and, accordingly, her experience in representing children is considerable.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority supported by the Children’s Guardian sought Care and Placement Order. The final hearing included cross examination of expert witnesses where the issues related to the mother’s alcohol use. Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority and the court made an order allowing the child to return to the care of the mother under a Child Arrangements Order.
- At a three day interim care hearing Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority to remove two children from the care of parents due to issues of chronic neglect. In this hearing Kerry represented the father. The children remained in the care of the parents subject to an interim care order pending further assessments.
- Representation of young mother with learning disabilities in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority were applying for Care and Placement orders. The final hearing took place over 8 days and included lengthy cross examination of expert witnesses.
- Representation of Local Authority at Final hearing which was heard over eight days. The Children’s Guardian did not support the plans of the Local Authority. Kerry was successful in persuading the court to approve the Local Authority plans.
- Cases involving adoption where applications for leave to revoke a Placement Order and leave to oppose an Adoption Order have been made.
Private Law
Kerry Barker also represents parties in private law cases, including those where there are significant welfare issues. She is regularly instructed in residence, contact, prohibited steps, specific issue order applications and leave to remove from the jurisdiction (both internal and external) and is able to provide advice on discrete matters of law and evidence.
Kerry’s private law practice is dominated by complex cases including issues such as long-standing domestic abuse, allegations of rape and sexual abuse, allegations of violence to children, and removal from the jurisdiction. Kerry is a favorite amongst solicitors for her delicate approach to such sensitive matters.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in private law proceedings in the High Court. The issues before the court related to competing jurisdictional arguments between UK and Greece.
- Representation of the child within private law proceedings where the issue before the court was one of Jurisdiction. It was being argued that the proceedings ought to be stayed and proceedings transferred to Scotland. Kerry successfully argued that the UK has jurisdiction.
- Representation of father within private law proceedings where the mother had applied to remove the child from the jurisdiction to Pakistan. Kerry was successful in opposing the mother’s application.
- Representation of client within proceedings where the mother sought to relocate over 200 miles within the UK. Kerry successfully opposed the mother’s application on behalf of the father.
- Kerry has dealt with a number of cases involving same-sex relationships and is well versed in case law relating to the area.
Domestic Violence
Kerry is regularly instructed to represent parties before the court in connection with applications under the Family Law Act 1996. Additionally, Kerry also represents parties in applications arising under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997. In this area, Kerry represents both applicants and respondents in cases which involve very serious harm. Kerry’s approachability and friendly nature makes her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
Notable Cases
AB v Durham County Council [2024] EWFC 15
High Court - In November 2024, Kerry Barker represented the Local Authority in the case of AB v Durham County Council. AB (father) made an application to revoke the placement order that was issued in 2023.The application was refused as it was found that the children's best interests lie with the prospective adopters.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/370.html.
A Metropolitan District Council v M & Ors [2019] EWFC 15
Kerry was Junior Counsel, Led by Gillian Irving QC instructed to represent the Applicant Local Authority in which the Local Authority sought care orders in relation to 6 children. The case involved serious allegations of sexual abuse; expert evidence and was heard over 10 days.
C (A Child: Serious Physical Injuries fact finding ) [2018] EWFC 13
Kerry represented the mother at the fact finding hearing which was heard over eight days before Holman J. The issue before the court was who had caused very significant injuries to the child who was just 5 weeks old at the time she sustained her injuries. The mother was exonerated from causing the injuries.
Re W ( A Child) [2017] EWFC B42
Representation of the Children’s Guardian on an application made by the Local Authority for Leave to Appeal. In this case, Kerry appeared against Leading Counsel.
Re B ( A Child: Guardianship Order) [2017] EWFC B39
Representation of the mother in Public Law Proceedings where the court was faced with the decision as to whether to make a Special Guardianship Order or Care Order.
Re P ( A Child) [2016] EWFC B42
Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority sought final Care and Placement Orders.
Clerks
Laura McBride
Call: 2012
Laura McBride
Deputy Head of the Criminal Law Team
LL.B (Hons), University of Newcastle (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course (2012)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02DNO
Grade 3 RASSO Prosecutor
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Laura McBride is a highly regarded and experienced advocate practicing in all areas of criminal law, professional discipline and inquests.
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal Team at Broadway House Chambers. She is a Grade 3 prosecutor and a member of the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Assault Panel.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Reputation
- Assistant Legal Advisor BBC National Treasure (2016)
- Disclosure seminars: CPS, South Yorkshire Police, Broadway House Chambers annual conference
Expertise
Crime
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal team at Broadway House Chambers.
Laura is a sought-after trial advocate. Her attention to detail and in-depth understanding of disclosure in criminal cases are second to none. She is a persuasive jury advocate and her reputation means that she is often instructed in serious, complex and high-profile cases, for example, the Rotherham child sexual abuse trials and prosecutions relating to the Hillsborough disaster.
Laura has experience dealing with young and highly vulnerable witnesses and defendants. She has a wide range of experience and has been instructed in cases involving offences of murder, attempt murder, serious sexual offences, human trafficking and fraud.
Her outstanding ability is reflected in her level of experience and success.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Notable Cases
R v Poole (2025) - Prosecution - Led by Michelle Colborne KC, prosecuted a defendant accused of killing her 92-year-old husband with a garden tool before setting his body on fire. Defendant was deemed unfit to stand trial and given an indefinite hospital order following a jury determination that she did the act of causing his death.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c201ldlm4x1o
R v P and B – Ongoing high-profile prosecution into historical physical and sexual abuse at a residential care home. Led by Michele Colborne KC.
R v H (2025) - Defence – Trial involved allegations of historical rape in a domestic context.
R v W (2025) - Defence - Defence trial involving multiple allegations of rape by 4 complainants. Case included both historical and present-day allegations.
R v A (2025) – Defence – Historical allegations of rape. Complex legal arguments relating to the admissibility of deceased witness evidence as hearsay.
R v M (2025) – Defence – High-profile case involving extensive evidence. Defendant charged with conspiracy to convey prohibited items into custody. Laura McBride led Lauren Smith.
R v S (2025) – Defence - Defendant charged with manslaughter. Case involves complex legal arguments including the interpretation of the law in relation to Unlawful Act Manslaughter. Led by Michelle Colborne KC.
R v R (2025) – Defence – Represented the interests of a Defendant who was found unfit to plead by the court and at the subsequent finding of fact hearing.
R v H [2024] – Prosecution - Prosecution trial involving allegations of a series of sexual offences and grooming of a 14 year old girl.
R v Smalley & Leaning (2024) - Prosecution - Successful prosecution of two defendants convicted of murder and manslaughter. Led by Michelle Colborne KC
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99xn88pgp2o.amp
R v B (2024) – Prosecution - Charged with possession with intent to supply class A and class B drugs. Sentenced to four years and nine months. https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/leeds-mans-mum-said-adhd-30104475
R v S (2024) – Defence – Instructed for defence of client charged with possession of Class A Drugs with intent to supply and dangerous driving. Found with 57kg of cocaine with a street value of £5.7m-£7m. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2k005g3lzo
R v W (2024) – Prosecution – Defendant charged of causing bodily harm by wanton and furious driving. W was cycling at speed and highly impaired by alcohol. She injured a pedestrian who then required a hip replacement. W was sentenced to 8 months imprisonment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx88g1v8en7o
R v SP (2024): Prosecution junior counsel in an allegation of murder. The case involves complex medical evidence relating to the defendant’s mental health at the time of the incident.
R v SK and Others (2024): Junior counsel involving the prosecution of an OCG involved in Class A and Class B drugs supply in the West Yorkshire area.
R v AA (2024): Defence counsel in a large scale CSE grooming trial in the Bradford area.
R v NK and NK (2024): Prosecution counsel in a case alleging kidnap and serious assault.
R v MR and others (2023): Defence junior counsel in one of the first prosecutions in the UK involving the manufacturing of 3D printed firearms.
R v TS (2023): Defence counsel in a prosecution of an OCG following the high profile infiltration of the Encrochat platform by international law enforcement agencies. This case involved the estimated supply of over 100kg of class A drugs (Estimated valuation £4 million).
R v JW (2023): Defence junior counsel in a high-profile case of fraud involving a politician. The defendant was acquitted of all counts following trial.
R v LT (2023): Defence counsel in a case in which the defendant was charged with attempt murder.
R v K & ors (2022): Laura is currently prosecuting a multi-handed robbery. Defendants accused of partaking in several robberies over the course of a matter of months.
R v Selby (2022): Prosecution counsel - The defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary following trial.
R v K (2022): Laura represented the defendant, an NHS employee, who was acquitted of all charges following trial.
R v Hussain & ors (2021): Junior in a Rotherham historical child grooming case. Led by Jayne Beckett.
R v D (2020): Defendant was charged with Rape and was acquitted following trial. Use of unused material including telephone logs and medical evidence that had been disclosed in order to discredit witness. Use of vulnerable witness protocols including section 28 procedure.
R v H (2020): Prosecuted defendant who was charged with child cruelty against his 2 year old stepson. H was convicted after trial and the case involved use of medical evidence demonstrating causation of injuries.
R v B (2020): Defendant originally charged with attempted murder but was instead charged with Robbery and a Section 18. Defended and led by Rodney Ferm.
Operation Kavaic 1/2 (Sept 2018/July 2019): Part of operation Stovewood. First operation led by Michelle Colborne KC and second operation led by Ann Cotcher KC. Laura was the disclosure Junior. High profile Rotherham CSE grooming Case. https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/view,breaking-child-abuse-gang-jailed-for-a-total-of-101-years_29495.htm
R v Mohammed Nisar Khan & ors (2019): Disclosure junior in high profile Bradford murder. As a result of the work undertaken, Laura received two awards from the Police. https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/17610266.mohammed-nisar-meggy-khan-tony-grant-salman-ismail-sentenced-bradford-moor-murder-trial/
Operation Thunder (2017): Prosecution Junior led by Sophie Drake (Now HHJ McKone). This case formed part of the investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area. https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2017-01-25/five-rotherham-men-found-guilty-of-historic-sex-abuse.
Operation Clover 2 (2016): Prosecution Disclosure Junior in a high profile multi-handed trial regarding Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-37873340
R v Hussain and Others (2016): Disclosure junior in the high profile Rotherham abuse trial.
R v Halligan (2016): Prosecuted a sentence in a s18 wounding with intent and possession of an offensive weapon. The defendant was deemed dangerous and received an extended custodial sentence.
R v Baron (2016): Represented a man who pleaded guilty to converting criminal property in a multi-handed fraud trial.
R v Madden (2016): Represented a man who pleaded guilty to possession of a high number of indecent images.
R v Egan (2015): Successfully prosecuted a trial of sexual assault on a female and assault.
R v H (2015): Laura secured a conviction in a racially aggravated public order offence involving the use of an intermediary.
R v P (2015): Laura successfully defended a private ambulance driver charged with driving through a red light. The case was dismissed.
R v D (2015): Laura prosecuted a serving Police Officer who was convicted both at the Magistrates’ Court and following an Appeal, a case reported by the National press.
Clerks
Jake Ellis
Call: 2010
Jake Ellis
Head of the Business, Property & Probate Team
LLB Bachelor of Law - 2:1, LLM Master of Laws – Merit, BVC (Very Competent)
Lincolns Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02ECP
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Jake has very quickly established himself as a leading financial remedy and property specialist and as “a name to watch by instructing solicitors”.
Jake is considered to be well versed in matrimonial finance cases involving trusts, business/commercial interests, inherited wealth and farming assets and is regularly instructed to act in cases of significant value.
As the Head of the Business, Property and Probate Team, Jake’s finance and property practice extends to complex disputes between unmarried couples pursuant to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 as well as claims arising out of the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975.
Reputation
Legal 500
“Jake is extremely charismatic and enthusiastic. He really excels in financial remedy work. A junior punching above his weight.” (2025)
“A strong advocate with laser-like attention to detail. He listens to the client and provides clear and comprehensive analytical advice. A barrister who is always prepared to go the extra mile.” (2023 and 2024)
“Jake is an excellent communicator who provides robust advice. He can turn a complex set of facts into a clear pleaded case. He puts clients at ease straightaway with his very personable approach.” (2022)
Chambers and Partners
"Jake is a smooth advocate and he does not compromise on detail. He is great with clients, very knowledgeable, always prepared and has strong advocacy skills.” (2025)
“Jake Ellis is noted for his dedication to clients and cases. He is particularly well versed in handling the financial aspects of separations, many of those involving complex structures such as inherited wealth and farming assets.” (2023 and 2024)
"Nothing is too much trouble for him and he relates well to clients of all types. Jake goes above and beyond for clients and instructing solicitors. His manner with clients is fantastic. A popular junior noted for his dedication to clients and cases. He is particularly well versed in handling the financial aspects of separations, many of those involving complex structures such as inherited wealth and farming assets.” (2022)
Articles and Seminars
Jake has had articles published in the Family Law Journal. Jake also regularly speaks at Chambers seminars concerning finance and TOLATA matters.
Articles:
Drafting re property disputes in FR proceedings [2024] Fam Law 625
Family Businesses in Financial Remedy Proceedings [2021] Fam Law 98
Expertise
Financial Remedy
Jake advises and represents clients in financial relief proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings and is regularly instructed to assist and represent clients attempting alternative methods of resolution, such as at mediation, round table conferences/discussions and private FDR’s.
Jake has experience across the broad spectrum of financial remedy cases but has a particular expertise in cases which include disputes involving trusts, business/commercial interests, inherited wealth and farming assets.
Jake is also available to put his specialist knowledge to use as a private FDR judge.
Business, Property and Probate
Jake has a thriving practice advising and representing clients in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Jake’s busy chancery practice blends well with his extensive financial remedy practice, in particular property disputes arising out of cohabitation and challenges to interests in family estates.
Notable Cases
HK v SS [2025] EWFC 5 (B) (14 January 2025): Application to permit making of conditional divorce order to be made final, where parties had reconciled for 15 months after conditional order. Held, the applicant should be entitled to apply for final order.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2025/5.html
Jake was instructed in a case involving a large property portfolio, held in the UK and abroad and on trust by third parties, and a number of commercial interests, valued at over £17 million.
Jake was instructed in a case that culminated in a 7 day trial, involving two interveners and several witnesses, to resolve a dispute around interests in capital and property held in the UK and abroad.
Jake was instructed in a case that concerned assets of over £2.3 million, which largely consisted of a multi-generational farm and investments inherited by the Applicant Husband.
Jake was instructed to act in a case concerning a multi-generational family farm brought into the marriage by the respondent and associated business established by the parties during the marriage and operated as a partnership.
Jake was instructed in a case concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement and loan agreement in a case where the assets were valued at over £1.3 million.
Clerks
Alyssa Howard
Call: 2014
Alyssa Howard
BA (1st class honours), Trinity Hall, Cambridge University
MA Cambridge University
Bateman Scholar, University of Cambridge (for top 1st in year)
Lincoln’s Inn, Lord Denning Scholar
Lincoln’s Inn, Hardwicke Scholar
Graduate Diploma in Law and BPTC (BPP Law School, London)
Family Law Bar Association
Resolution
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Alyssa is an experienced family law specialist, having exclusively practised in the areas of financial remedies and private children for over 10 years.
Alyssa has a reputation for being exceptionally well prepared and ‘going the extra mile’ to ensure that her clients have the best representation and advice possible. Alyssa is a robust and effective advocate in Court. Combined with her down to earth and approachable bedside manner, she is a popular choice with clients and solicitors dealing with difficult cases.
Alyssa has a particular interest in complex private children cases and is often instructed in cases involving alienating behaviours/implacable hostility. She is also sought after in financial remedy cases, where her technical knowledge and pragmatic advice have made her first choice for many solicitors.
Alyssa accepts instructions on a public access basis.
Reputation
Expertise
Financial Remedy
Alyssa has significant experience in matrimonial finances cases at all stages of proceedings. Her practice also encompasses acting for Intervenors and Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 matters.Recent work Alyssa has undertaken in this area includes:
• Cases involving the Official Solicitor
• S37 injunctions
• The successful setting aside of a consent order on the grounds of misrepresentation and duress
• Acting for Intervenors in a case involving a large family property portfolio
• Cases involving insolvency
• Financial disputes concerning farming and agricultural enterprises
Alyssa regularly provides advice in these areas, at conference and by way of written opinion.
Private Children
Alyssa has a particular interest in difficult and complex private children cases. She is often instructed on cases involving parental alienation/alienating behaviours and matters which involve serious allegations of domestic abuse.Alyssa is frequently instructed to appear on behalf of clients in a wide variety of Private Children Law cases including Child Arrangements Orders, International and Internal Relocation applications, Special Guardianship Orders and Private Adoption. She is also regularly instructed to provide advice in these areas, both in writing and in conference.
Alyssa is popular with solicitors and clients in high-conflict private children cases. A particular case she was instructed on was described by the expert psychologist as ‘the most serious case of parental alienation I have come across in my entire career.’
Domestic Abuse
Alyssa is regularly instructed in applications under Part IV Family Law Act 1996. She is first choice for many solicitors in these matters, due to her sensitivity and care in dealing with vulnerable clients.
Notable Cases
Anon (2023) - financial remedy proceedings involving a current political figure. Income arguments related to parliamentary expenses.
Re O (2022)– private law children case involving two serving police officers, in a matter whereby the Father has been charged with rape and sexual assault. The case also involved legal argument in respect of adducing evidence of covert recordings.
Re B (2022) private law children case whereby F was imprisoned for stalking and other domestic abuse related offences. Case involving serious allegations of coercive control.
Anon (2022) – financial remedy proceedings involving a well-known retired sportsman. Issues in the case included pension sharing in respect of pension accrued at height of sporting career.
N v N (2020)– private law case which eventually became public law, following arrest of one party for employing others to spray acid at one of the children. Criminal proceedings ensued which attracted widespread national press interest.
P (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 1428 – Alyssa acted at first instance and thereafter successfully for her client in the Court of Appeal in a complex private law children matter involving international elements and an ‘abusive’ mother, with an order for no direct contact being upheld by the Court of Appeal.
S (A Child) [2015] EWFC B212 – Private law children case involving unknown whereabouts of Respondent birth parents. Child Arrangements Order made in client’s favour.
London Borough of Waltham Forest v AD [2014] EWHC 1985 (Fam) – Instructed on a case for a Local Authority on behalf of the child requesting a reporting restriction in a case where the Father had killed the Mother. Guidance given by Keenan J as to procedure in such applications.
Clerks
Susan Sanders
Call: 2015
Susan Sanders
MA (Hons), University of Edinburgh, Persian and Social Anthropology (1999)
Graduate Diploma in Law (2014, Distinction)
Bar Professional Training Course (2015, Outstanding)
Middle Temple
Queen Mother Scholar (2014)
Family Law Mediator
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02ENW
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Susan joined Broadway House in September 2016 after successfully completing a mixed pupillage.
She practises family and immigration law and has a particular interest and expertise in the overlap between these two areas. She is qualified to undertake work on a direct access basis.
Susan has an insightful approach and is regularly instructed to represent those who require sensitive and considerate client-care.
Before coming to the Bar Susan worked for human rights organisations and campaigned and carried out research in Afghanistan for Amnesty International. Susan speaks French and Farsi.
Susan is a family mediator and is available to mediate in cases involving child arrangements disputes and financial issues after separation.
Reputation
Articles
Unreasonable law – contested divorce and the case of Owens v Owens
Seminars
- Public Law Children: Deprivation of Liberty (2018)
- Disclosure of Material: Family & Criminal Proceedings (2018)
- Gatekeeping the IAC- Restrictions on appeal rights: Third Country, Clearly Unfounded and Remove First Certificates (2018)
- Trafficking and Age assessments (2019)
- ‘Immigration Applications for Children in Care & Immigration Issues for Kinship Carers/Parents Abroad’ (2021)
- How to prepare for a Deportation Appeal – Family and Private Life (2022)
Legal Directories
“Her approach to advocacy is creative and engaging, whilst also being measured and sensitive. A junior who demonstrates careful and methodical reasoning.” (Legal 500, 2025)
“Susan is a very diligent barrister, with extensive knowledge of asylum and immigration law. She is an excellent communicator, and her ability to listen to clients puts them at ease during stressful situations for them. She is pragmatic and clear when giving advice” (Legal 500, 2023 and 2024)
“Susan is very dedicated and has in-depth knowledge of immigration law. Her advocacy is thoughtful and measured. She is particularly attentive to the needs of vulnerable clients and quickly builds a rapport with them.” (Legal 500, 2022)
Expertise
Family
Susan has a busy practice in all areas of family law and represents privately and publicly funded clients from directions hearings through to contested final hearings. She is regularly instructed in private law finding of fact hearings involving serious allegations, including rape, and in public law proceedings for the local authority. She is also involved in cases of domestic abuse, forced marriage, and those with an immigration element. She regularly advises local authorities in relation to immigration issues within public law proceedings.
She is a sensitive and effective communicator. One lay client said she is “absolutely wonderful and very professional with her work, [a] fantastic lady with big experience and commitment”.
Immigration
Susan regularly appears in the First Tier and Upper Tribunals and is committed to providing first class representation to those seeking asylum. She is often asked to advise and drafts judicial review claims as well as applications for permission to appeal.
Before coming to the Bar Susan worked for many years as a legal representative for asylum seekers at Refugee and Migrant Justice and in private practice. She is passionate about representing vulnerable individuals and carries out pro bono advocacy for the Manuel Bravo Project and Bail for Immigration Detainees. Her experience working in Central Africa, Iran and Afghanistan provides invaluable background for this work.
“The clients were very happy with the way the appeal was prepared and presented, [and] asked that I extend the family’s thank you to you. I am attaching a copy of the Tribunal’s decision … the appeal was allowed. This is an excellent result in a potentially tricky case with a long and difficult history" (Instructing Solicitor)
Notable Cases
Family
Re X – Represented mother in successful application to terminate a father's parental responsibility. This unusual application was made following the father's conviction for coercive and controlling behaviour and rape of the mother.
Re D – Junior counsel in High Court hearing considering allegations of child sexual exploitation
A v A – Finding of fact dealing with allegations of shooting and attempted kidnap
H v H – Finding of fact successfully represented a father facing allegations of sexual and physical abuse. No findings were made.
N v H –Successfully argued for set-aside of a declaration of trust on the basis of fraud at a preliminary issue hearing in financial remedy proceedings
Immigration
JG v SSHD – Successfully appealed decision to deport Jamaican national convicted of burglary, appeal then upheld by UT
EB v SSHD – Permission to appeal granted by the UT on basis of application of European case law to article 3 medical case, pending Supreme Court hearing of AM (Zimbabwe)
GK v SSHD – Upper Tribunal allowed human rights appeal of elderly Indian relative, finding paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi) was met. Appeal had been dismissed by First Tier Tribunal.
Advised EEA extended family member who, as a result, obtained residence permit on the basis of the EU Court of Justice case of Lounes
Clerks
Christopher Styles
Call: 2015
Christopher Styles
University of Oxford
Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
Bar Professional Training Course (Outstanding)
Legal Aid Supplier Number o2EQY
Deputy District Judge
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Christopher joined Broadway House Chambers in September 2015. He is a busy junior practitioner, specialising in the field of public family law.
Legal 500- Leading Junior (2025): 'Fearless with an encyclopedic knowledge of the law. Christopher combines an enviable intellect, a forensic approach, and eloquent, persuasive advocacy with an open and approachable manner with both professional and lay clients.'
Legal 500- Leading Junior (2024): ‘Even in the most difficult and complex cases Christopher’s advocacy is calm under pressure- he is an outstanding and persuasive advocate. He has an uncanny ability to think outside the box and find a way forward.’
Legal 500- Leading Junior (2023): ‘Christopher’s strength is his fierce intelligence, and his ability to persuade the tribunal by using that intelligence eloquently and with considered force. Talented…an absolute star in the making.’
Legal 500- Rising Star (2022): ‘He has a meticulous eye for detail, prepares diligently and provides clear, compelling advocacy- one to watch.’
Reputation
Expertise
Christopher is an established family law practitioner, specialising in the representation of parents and children in public law proceedings. He is routinely instructed in cases of gravity- including those involving inflicted injury, sexual abuse, homicide, honour-based violence, cruelty and systematic neglect.
Christopher is an experienced trial advocate and can be relied on to forcefully advocate for clients both in writing and in court. He has a reputation for rigour, with a busy paper practice advising on complex matters of jurisdiction and safeguarding.Christopher understands the unique character of the family jurisdiction. He is trusted by solicitors to advise with both sensitivity and tact.
Notable Cases
Re M (Placement Order) EWCA Civ 214: Representation of a child in complex appellate proceedings relating to international placement and its interplay with the 'nothing else will do' adoptive standard. Submissions on behalf of the child accepted- with grant of a placement order reaffirmed (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2025/214.html)
A Local Authority (Alleged Honour Based Abuse) [2024] EWFC 177: Representation of a family member in complex proceedings concerning honour-based abuse and its alleged connection to a homicide. Following a ten-day finding of fact hearing the court concluded that the Local Authority had failed to prove any link between the murder and honour-based abuse (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/177.html)
A Local Authority v B & Ors [2024] EWFC 346: Representation of a child following widespread violent disorder in the Harehills area of Leeds. Proposed family placement approved (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/346.html) Re C [2024]: Representation of a Father accused of physical abuse by way of hitting, use of implements and stress positions. Following cross-examination of the interviewing officer and social worker all allegations were dismissed, with rehabilitation directed. Re NI [2024]: Representation of a Mother accused of killing her husband in the presence of the subject child. Successful proportionality submission, with no adverse findings made against Mother and regular contact directed. Re Y [2023] EWHC 2040: Representation of a child in complex High Court relinquishment proceedings. Guidance given on appropriate procedure and case management (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/2040.html) Re U [2023]: Representation of a Ukrainian military officer in a High Court dispute regarding welfare, the ongoing conflict and jurisdiction. Return to Kiev directed. Re B [2023]: Representation of a young woman accused of forcibly branding a baby with a cigarette. Client exonerated following a six-day trial. Re L [2022]: Representation of a deaf mother with profound cognitive limitations making allegations of child abuse. Allegations upheld following a nine-day trial. Re A [2022]: Representation of a sixteen year old alleging a ‘campaign of rape’ by her own Father. All sought findings made. Re R [2021]: Two-week trial representing a parent accused of shaking an eight month old baby. Medical evidence challenged and no identification findings made. Re S [2021]: Representation of a child following threats from a reality TV star to sell case details to News International. Global reporting injunctions imposed. Re M [2021]: Representation of a father accused of murdering his partner, where the subject child acts as witness for the prosecution. Psychological evidence challenged and placement with family approved Re C [2020]: Representation of a parent at an eleven-day finding of fact encompassing the cross-examination of a seven year old child. Client exonerated and rehabilitation ordered. Re F [2020]: Representation of grandparents opposing a plan of adoption. Kinship assessment successfully challenged, with the court making findings of exaggeration and distortion against the allocated social worker.
Clerks
Christopher Rowe
Call: 2014
Christopher Rowe
M Law Exempting (BPTC), Northumbria University (First Class)
Bar Professional Training Course (Outstanding)
Lawyers Without Borders Intern 2014
Woon Foundation Scholarship (2011)
Honour Roll, Northumbria University School of Law (2012, 2013, 2014)
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Christopher is a member of Broadway House Chambers Family Team and Business, Property & Probate Team. He specialises in:
• Financial Remedy
• Private Law Children
• Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).
Reputation
‘Christopher has a very calming influence on clients and opponents alike. He is exceptionally well-prepared and his advocacy style is concise, which is always welcomed by the judiciary.’ (Band 2, Legal 500, 2025)
Christopher is committed to access to justice. He was shortlisted for Young Pro Bono Barrister of the Year at Advocate’s Pro Bono Awards in 2021 having completed 100 hours of Pro Bono work for Advocate in 12 months. Christopher undertook a further 25 hours to celebrate Advocate’s 25th anniversary and continues to work with Advocate.
Expertise
Family
Financial Remedy Proceedings
Christopher is a financial remedy specialist. His practice includes cases where:
• pre and post-nuptial agreements feature, including challenges to those agreements;
• properties and other assets, including pensions, are located abroad;
• businesses and partnerships are a central part of the proceedings;
• complex pensions issues arise; and
• where assets are dissipated and injunction applications are issued.
Christopher is dedicated to bringing a calm and measured approach to each case and prides himself on his ability to work collaboratively with professional clients. He focuses on providing clear and practical advice to clients, cutting to the core of the issues in a case to find a solution wherever possible.
Christopher’s dual financial remedy and TOLATA practice means that he is well placed to advise and represent clients in financial remedy proceedings where trust/property ownership issues are a key feature.
He is equally comfortable advising in conference (in person or remotely) or in writing and is able to travel.
Private Law Children
Christopher’s private law children practice sees him regularly instructed in complex and entrenched proceedings. He represents clients in cases involving:
• Proposed relocation of children both abroad and within the UK;
• Allegations of domestic abuse, both at fact finding and welfare hearings; and
• Where a Children’s Guardian is appointed.
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996
Christopher’s TOLATA practice includes both cohabitation cases and where properties are owned for investment purposes. He regularly speaks at conferences/webinars on TOLATA matters throughout the year.
Christopher’s practical and concise approach to cases assists clients in finding a workable solution to prospective litigation. Christopher places great emphasis on working as a team with professional clients, from the outset, to prepare a case and if possible explore settlement options.
His practice includes drafting pleadings, advising in person and in writing (both pre and post action), and representing clients at case management conferences, other hearings and trials.
Clerks
Ned Sproston
Call: 2014
Ned Sproston
MPhys (Master of Physics)
PGCE (Secondary Education)
GDL (Distinction)
BPTC (Very Competent)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FEJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Ned is a Family and Civil practitioner, predominantly practising in the field of Private Children. He receives a significant volume of instructions in contested hearings such as Finding of Fact Hearings and Final Hearings. In addition to this, Ned’s practice also covers Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act cases and, TOLATA. In the civil sphere, Ned takes on Road Traffic Accident cases and other Personal Injury claims. Ned does not generally practice in Public Children cases but will remain with a client under circumstances where a Private case enters the Public Law arena part way through..
Ned is a qualified civil and commercial mediator and is available for instruction in that capacity. Please enquire about this with our clerks if this is a service you might consider.
Reputation
“Never one to shy away from knotty issues, Ned’s forensic and calm approach to complex private law cases is reassuring to clients and practitioners alike. He is always approachable and on-hand to discuss any issue of the case no matter how small. A pleasure to work with" (Partner at Local Firm)
Expertise
Family
Private Children - Over 80% of Ned’s workload covers Private Children matters covering the spectrum of issues. Ned has a reputation as an advocate who is able to quickly get to grips with a trial bundle and separate “the wheat from the chaff”. As a former secondary school teacher, Ned is experienced working with young and/or vulnerable people and is good at helping lay clients consider (and hopefully accept) what can sometimes be difficult truths, in a sensitive manner.
Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act, and TOLATA – A significant minority of Ned’s workload covers these areas of the law and he is happy to accept appropriate instruction accordingly. Ned is very ethically minded and aware of the importance of trying to reach a fair settlement at an early stage if possible.
Civil
Personal Injury – Ned regularly accepts instructions in this area and has found that his background in Physics sometimes comes in handy when trying to analyse and argue the mechanics of a road traffic collision when causation is in dispute.
Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act, and TOLATA – A significant minority of Ned’s workload covers these areas of the law and he is happy to accept appropriate instruction accordingly. Ned is very ethically minded and aware of the importance of trying to reach a fair settlement at an early stage if possible.
Clerks
Lydia Pearce
Call: 2017
Lydia Pearce
Bradford University BA Hons
ULaw York GDL
BPP Leeds BPTC
Middle Temple Harmsworth Scholar GDL
Middle Temple Harmsworth Scholar BPTC
Blackstones Entrance Exhibition Award
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FXD
Grade 3 Prosecutor
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Lydia Pearce has been a tenant of Broadway House Chambers since completing pupillage in 2018 and now works exclusively in Criminal Law.
With previous experience in family and civil law, Lydia is able to appreciate the ways in which these other areas of law can impact criminal cases.
Before coming to the Bar Lydia worked for West Yorkshire Police as a Detention Officer whilst studying law part time over 6 years. Before pupillage Lydia was seconded to work with the National Police Chiefs’ Council on the pre-charge bail provisions of the Policing and Crime Act 2017. Lydia’s arguments were successfully used to make changes to the bill prior to royal assent. Lydia’s guidance document to implementation was disseminated to UK police forces and used by BBC reports on the impact of pre-charge bail.
Reputation
Legal 500 – Tier 3 (2025): “the ‘tenacious’ Lydia Pearce is well-versed in advising on cases of serious sexual offences, drugs conspiracies and serious violence.” - "Lydia has an incisive attention to detail, communicates important points in an easy-to-understand way, and has a personable style which clients and juries enjoy."
Legal 500 – Rising Star (2023 & 2024): 'A robust junior and a fantastic barrister’.
Client Feedback:
‘Lydia has made an outstanding entrance to the bar with a seemingly unparalleled zeal and dynamism. Lydia commands a solid presence in court and has strong, dependable advocacy skills. A down to earth approach coupled with meticulous attention to detail almost certainly assure Lydia a very illustrious future. I would certainly tip Lydia as a star who will rise very quickly.’
‘Lydia has excellent client care skills. Lydia is a diligent barrister who is skilled at empathising and reassuring vulnerable clients whilst remaining dedicated to achieving a fair and just outcome.’
‘Both myself and the social work team were very happy with Lydia’s representation. It was clear Lydia was fully prepared and on top of the brief. I am sure we will work together again’
‘I was very impressed with Lydia's grasp of the case, at short notice, and the way Lydia dealt with the hearing, for which both I and my client are grateful.’
Expertise
Criminal
Lydia appears in the Crown Court to both defend and prosecute in a range of matters including assault, sexual offences, weapons, dishonesty matters and drugs. She is known for thorough preparation and being able to respond quickly to changing instructions.
Defence
Lydia has been briefed on a range of criminal defence cases and is particularly skilled in working with vulnerable or juvenile clients.Lydia defends cases from Magistrates' Court to Crown Court maintaining involvement (where possible) across the lifetime of matters including PTPHs, preliminary hearings including S28 pre-recorded evidence and trials. Lydia works closely with instructing solicitors and is happy to have conferences in advance of hearings to ensure readiness. Lydia is equally happy to take last minute instructions where required.
Prosecution
Lydia is instructed in a range of prosecution cases and regularly works for the CPS, Probation Service, SIA and local authorities.Lydia prosecutes cases from Magistrates' Court to Crown Court maintaining involvement (where possible) across the lifetime of matters including PTPHs, preliminary hearings including S28 pre-recorded evidence and trials. Lydia will regularly draft documents and advise on matters outside of court hearings.
Other:
Vunerable Witness Training Completed
CPD Webinars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNB2sT7ERuI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmWESNMg3Ek
Notable Cases
Defence
R v T (2024): Instructed as Junior Counsel for the defence, led by Abigail Langford. Ms Pearce was instructed as junior counsel in a case of child sexual offences. The indictment has 27 counts covering offending over 20+ years and 5 complainants. Ms Pearce dealt with client care, unused material, disclosure requests and cross examined a vulnerable witness.
R v P (2024): Instructed as Junior Counsel for the defence, led by Jayne Beckett for defendant 1 of 5 in a historic grooming trial. Ms Pearce handled the voluminous unused material, ongoing disclosure, crystalising all salient material for defence cross examination into a bundle for the court and agreed facts.
R v P (2024): Defence robbery, sexual and physical assault and stalking. Ms Pearce was able to obtain phone downloads from the prosecution on Day 1 of trial. Adjournment was applied for but not granted so whilst the trial was ongoing, Ms Pearce worked with the defence phone expert to compile specific relevant extracts in a short form report. Those extracts were served on the prosecution after the complainant had completed their evidence. The extracts put enough doubt on the credibility of the complainant to force the prosecution to apply to discharge the jury and carry out further investigations which lead to some charges being dropped. Ms Pearce made a full bail application, supported with evidence obtained by solicitors which lead to the defendant being granted bail after being held on remand for over 6 months.
R v X (2023): Reduction of sentence on appeal to the Court of Appeal, sentence was reduced from 12 months immediate custody to 6 months suspended.
R v X (2023): Securing a not guilty verdict for client accused of producing of methamphetamine due to a successful submission to dismiss the case.
R v O (2023): Defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated vehicle taking, drug driving, failing to attend court bail and being in breach of a suspended sentence order. Prior to these offences the defendant had received a suspended sentence order (24m suspended for 24M) in July 2020 for possession with intent to supply cocaine and heroin. Following mitigation advanced by Ms Pearce, the defendant was sentenced to a community order and the suspended sentence was not activated.
R v M (2023): Ms Pearce was instructed to represent defendant who was charged with Handling Stolen Goods value £10,000+. Lydia carefully researched the defence, collated a bundle of defence evidence and secured agreed facts which undermined the prosecution case. The defendant was acquitted by the jury in less than an hour. .
R v X: Acquittal for a juvenile client on a count of burglary dwelling prior to the client attending court by making successful submissions under S78 of PACE and the overriding objective.
R v X: Mitigated a sentence for a drink driver who provided a sample 3 times over the legal limit after having stopped the car on a moving motorway during a rainstorm, very nearly causing a pile up. Sentenced to community order and driving ban.
Prosecution
R v S & B(2023): Ms Pearce prosecuted 2 separate matters arising from the same incident, a fight. B was charged with S18 assault. The jury convicted him in less than 2 hours and he was sentenced to 5 years immediate custody.
R v D (2023): Defendant pleaded not guilty in the supply of class A drugs. In his evidence he claimed not to be the person on incriminating video footage, relying on his prominent left hand tattoo which was not on his left hand in the video. By inspection of the logo on his top in the video, Ms Pearce was able to prove that the video had been inverted and that the hand in the video was his non-tattooed right hand. He was convicted by the jury.
Lydia was instructed by Leeds City Council in their first ever prosecution of a landlord under Section 1(2) of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. She successfully secured a conviction and a custodial sentence against the defendant.
Prosecuted an appeal against sentence on behalf of Bradford City Council under animal welfare law, the appellant appealed his original sentence of 20 weeks immediate custody, but this was upheld by the Crown Court.
Instructed to prosecute on behalf of Bradford Council under public health legislation a property landlord for waste left in the curtilage of his rental property, the defendant was blind and therefore unable to check if the waste had been collected or not, he was also unrepresented at trial. Lydia worked with the Council sanitation workers, Council legal officers, a trusted and accredited waste removal company and the defendant collaboratively to solve the public health issue and not pursue the matter through the courts.
Clerks
Harry Wiltshire
Call: 2015
Harry Wiltshire
Bath University, BA Hons Business Administration
GDL and BPTC, BPP Leeds
Middle Temple, Harmsworth Scholar
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02GCI
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Harry is experienced in representing both Claimants and Respondents in the employment tribunal, he regularly appears in cases dealing with unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions, discrimination, whistle blowing and employment status.
Harry accepts instructions in private law children matters. He regularly deals with contested final hearings and multi day finding of fact hearings, including issues such as domestic violence and relocation.
Harry is developing a growing matrimonial finance practice, he is regularly instructed to undertake Financial Dispute Resolution Appointments and Final Hearings.
Harry is registered with the Bar Council to undertake direct access work.
Harry is a member of Broadway House Chambers Business, Property and Probate Team. Prior to Pupillage Harry ran his own business, he has a strong understanding of the pressures involved in the management of a SME and is comfortable dealing with commercial disputes.
Prior to pupillage Harry competed as a professional athlete. Harry is Deputy Head of Sports, Media and Entertainment Team. He has gained experience of contractual disputes and disciplinary proceedings in the sporting arena. He has also been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Reputation
Expertise
Employment
Harry regularly represents both Claimants and Respondents in the Employment Tribunal. He accepts instructions to advise, undertake drafting and attend hearings. Harry deals with a wide range of issues, including: employment status, unfair dismissal, discrimination (including disability and sex), whistleblowing detriment and holiday pay.
Sport
Prior to pupillage Harry spent 15 years competing as a professional athlete regularly representing Great Britain at international level. Harry’s experience as an athlete gives him a huge advantage when approaching sport cases and makes him a very appealing choice for lay clients in the sports arena.
Harry has experience of sports contract disputes and disciplinary proceedings. He has been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Harry is on the panel of regional Rugby Football Union prosecutors.
Harry works closely with Adam Willoughby, Head of the Sports Law Team. Harry has assisted him in dealing with contractual matters on behalf of Rugby Football League Teams and the preparation of anti-doping cases on behalf of athletes who have returned adverse analytical findings.
Harry’s Sports Law practice is complimented by his special interest in employment and contractual law.
Family Law
Harry practices in private children law and financial remedy.
Notable Cases
Mr AY Ali v Salix Homes and Michael Page International Recruitment Limited Case No. 2404266/2018
Successfully represented a recruitment agency over a four day hearing securing a finding that they could not have dismissed an agency worker on the grounds of a protected disclosure, when they had no knowledge of the disclosure at the time of dismissal. The case also raised a breach of contract, direct discrimination and worker/ employee status.
Mrs C Tantrum -v- Ashville College and others 180078/2018
Successfully argued at a three day hearing that the Claimant was an employee rather than a self employed sports teacher working at a private school. The finding meant that the matter settled following a judicial mediation. The case raised issues of protected disclosures, an unfair dismissal, holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages
Smith -v- Bradford District Care NHS
Representing the Claimant at a three day hearing dealing with claims of indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability, as well as harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Mr J Bassey -v- HMRC
Junior Counsel representing the respondent at a three week tribunal dealing with 88 allegations of harassment and racial discrimination.
Ms KJ Badon -v- The Secretary of Health & Social Care
Junior Counsel representing the Respondent at a two week hearing, where the Claimant alleged she was subjected to a detriment to deter, punish or prevent trade union activity.
Mr A Poznaski -v- Exceed Logistics Limited 2600570/2018
Represented the Claimant who asserted that he had been unfairly dismissed following an allegation of fuel theft. Secured a finding for the Claimant in relation to an unlawful deduction from wages.
Daniel Alden -v- Skinnergate Cycles Stockton Limited 2501655/2018
Successfully represented the Respondent securing the dismissal of the claim as out of time and through failure to comply with Court Orders. Disability also considered.
Clerks
Anna Sutcliffe
Call - 2015
Anna Sutcliffe
BPP University; BPTC; Outstanding
University of Cambridge, Fitzwilliam College, BA (Hons) Law; 2.1
Qualified Family Mediator
Family Law Bar Association
Resolution
Honourable Society of Middle Temple (Astbury Scholarship – 2014)
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Anna is a specialist family law barrister who has maintained a deliberately mixed practice encompassing matrimonial finance and both private and public law children work. This enables her to advise clients on all aspects of their family law case, particularly where different areas of family law overlap. Anna spent the first 9 years of her practice at a leading family law set in London and she has experience appearing at all levels up to and including representing clients in the High Court. She is equally happy appearing in her own right or being led as junior counsel.
Anna also conducts private FDR hearings (with experience as both counsel and pFDR “judge”), and is a qualified mediator for both children and finance matters.
Reputation
“Unfailingly well prepared and excellent with clients” – Chambers & Partners 2025
“Anna is efficient and approachable to work with. She provides highly technical advice and great client care” – Chambers & Partners 2025
“Anna takes difficult cases in her stride and is always calm, reassuring and to the point – judges love her.” – Chambers & Partners 2024
“Anna is a tremendous fighter. She is compassionate with vulnerable clients” – Legal 500, 2025
“Anna is a confident advocate who combines excellent knowledge of the law with a compelling style. She knows when to fight and when to negotiate and is incredibly calm under pressure.” – Legal 500, 2025
Family Law Awards: Shortlisted for Young Barrister of the Year (2019)
Expertise
Children Act
Anna regularly acts in applications for Child Arrangements Orders, Prohibited Steps Order and Specific Issue Orders (including disputes over issues such as schooling, holidays and name changes). She has a particular interest in domestic and international relocation proceedings. Anna conducts multi-day fact-finding hearings within Children Act proceedings, often involving serious allegations of abuse, and has acted in a number of cases involving the appointment of a Children’s Guardian. She regularly represents vulnerable clients.
Care
Anna acts in public law children proceedings on behalf of Local Authorities, parents, guardians and extended family members and has experience representing vulnerable clients (including those assisted by an intermediary).
Finance
Anna acts in all aspects of family finance proceedings, including financial remedies and Schedule 1 of the Children Act. She has experience dealing with cases involving high-net-worth individuals, third party interventions, pre/post nuptial agreements, and jurisdictional disputes. Anna also acts and advises in enforcement and variation proceedings.
Private FDR
Anna is available to conduct private FDRs.
Mediation
Anna is qualified to mediate in both financial and children disputes.
Notable Cases
F v Q (2025): Jurisdiction dispute in respect of financial remedy proceedings, with parallel proceedings currently ongoing in competing jurisdictions.
S v F (2025): Anna acts for a mother in private law proceedings with the appointment of a r.16.4 Guardian. Serious allegations of abuse and intractable opposition to contact.
S v S (2023): Junior counsel in HNW financial remedy proceedings heard in the High Court. Instructed by the Official Solicitor. Achieved favourable FDR indication leading to settlement.
T v T (2023): Representing a wife/mother in parallel children and finance proceedings, which culminated in a combined arbitration of both issues. Oral evidence required from both parents and an ISW. Outcome obtained in favour of Anna’s client on both issues, alongside a costs order.
B v C (2023): Application for a freezing injunction over c£2.5m from sale of foreign shares
M v B (2023): Anna acted for a father throughout high-conflict private law proceedings involving serious allegations of abuse. No findings were made against the father and the mother’s application to relocate with the children was successfully resisted. Findings were made in respect of the mother’s influence over the children and a shared care arrangement was implemented.
A v A (2023): Anna acted for a father throughout long running and highly acrimonious proceedings which involved, at various stages, applications by the mother to relocate overseas and internally withing the UK both of which were successfully resisted, with a shared care arrangement being implemented instead as sought by Anna’s client. The case involved particular sensitivities arising out of differing level of religious adherence between households.
Clerks
Paul Dormand
Call: 2013
Paul Dormand
BPP Manchester – GDL
Manchester Metropolitan University – BPTC
BPP Cohen Scholar
Middle Temple Harmsworth Scholar
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Paul Dormand is a member of the Family Law Team at Broadway House Chambers.
“I am using Paul on a tricky Private Law Children matter and I am very impressed with his teamwork approach. We are a small practice and it is very good to have Counsel who engage with their instructing solicitor throughout the life of the case” – Solicitor
"Paul Dormand is excellent at what he does and also an amazing person. He is very thorough, understanding, honest, trustworthy and his ability to relate to and empathise with others is remarkable. I highly recommend Paul for he is an excellent barrister and truly a genuine person. Paul has been so patient with me in this difficult time. He took the time to hear all of my concerns and clearly, concisely outlined all the different courses of action including the positives and negatives with each choice. Working with Paul was incredibly easy. He listened attentively and made me feel at ease. I could not have asked for better representation. Thank you" Client Feedback
Before coming to the Bar, Paul worked as a professional musician and teacher, performing with orchestras and ensembles all over the world.
Reputation
“*I am using Paul on a tricky Private Law Children matter and I am very impressed with his teamwork approach. We are a small practice and it is very good to have Counsel who engage with their instructing solicitor throughout the life of the case*” – Solicitor
Paul regularly presents webinar on behalf of Chambers’ Family and Employment Law Team.
Expertise
Family
Paul accepts instructions in all areas of family law, including children and finance work. Paul also accepts instructions in Court of Protection and Forced Marriage cases.
Private Children: Paul is regularly instructed to represent in private children matters, including contested applications and complex, multi day findings of fact and final hearings, often involving extremely vulnerable clients and litigants in person.
Public: Paul is instructed by Local Authorities, parents, and children in care proceedings at District and Circuit level, including case management, contested interim, and final hearings.
Financial Remedy: Paul also accepts instructions for applicants and respondents at all stages of financial remedy proceedings and is available to advise in writing or conference.
Clerks
Jenna Chaplin
Call: 2015
Jenna Chaplin
University of Sheffield, LLB Hons 2:1
University of Law, BPTC Very Competent
Middle Temple
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Jenna specialises in Private Children cases and Financial Remedy. Jenna is known for her sensitive client care, her tactful negotiation skills and her robust approach in court. Jenna prides herself on her hard-working nature, thorough preparation and attention to detail.
Jenna has a busy private children practice and has a strong track record for achieving excellent results for parents and wider family members. Jenna is regularly instructed to represent clients in complex private children cases involving serious allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation. Jenna appears in disputes regarding domestic and international relocation.
Jenna has a broad range of experience representing both Applicants and Respondents at all stages of financial remedy proceedings including final hearings. Jenna has experience in dealing with cases involving intervenors, wanton dissipation and hidden assets. Jenna is happy to advise in conference and in writing.
Jenna also accepts instructions in regulatory law, having previous experience whilst on secondment with a solicitors firm and subsequently in chambers.
Jenna joined chambers following successful completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Peter Hampton and Matthew Rudd. Prior to completing her pupillage, Jenna worked at a prestigious law firm in London.
Reputation
Jenna has conducted seminars for chambers including recently with Dornier Whittaker on alcohol testing and section 91(14) orders and Semaab Shaikh on guidance for remote hearings.
Expertise
Family
Jenna is a specialist family practitioner, undertaking cases involving private disputes regarding children and financial remedy.Jenna regularly appears in front of both District and Circuit Judges alike.
Jenna’s caseload routinely involves the following areas of private children:
• Applications for shared care/live with orders
• Applications for relocation of the children both domestically and internationally
• Applications for orders preventing the removal of a child from the jurisdiction
• Finding of Fact Hearings involving allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation
• Applications for orders determining the child’s schooling
Jenna is regularly instructed at all stages of financial remedy proceedings.
Regulatory
Jenna accepts instructions in regulatory law. Jenna has represented Social Work England at both interim and substantive hearings whilst on secondment with a local solicitor’s firm and subsequently in chambers. Jenna has experience in drafting documents for the Panel’s consideration and advising on the merits of complex cases.
Notable Cases
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/221.html
H v W (2024): Jenna represented the Wife at a Final Hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The Court was persuaded to transfer the family home to the Wife’s name for a payment to the Husband of just £5,000 – with the Wife retaining the entirety of her NHS pension.
R v E (2024): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother in proceedings concerning international relocation. Findings were made against the Father involving physical assaults, threatening behaviour including with weapons and controlling and coercive behaviour. These findings led to the Father not actively opposing the Mother’s proposed move abroad, which had been endorsed by Cafcass.
N v H (2024): Jenna is instructed to represent the Father in ongoing proceedings relating to his 1 year old son. Serious allegations of sexual violence throughout the relationship were made against the Father in addition to controlling and coercive behaviour. All of the findings sought against the Father were dismissed.
W v H (2023): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother at a FHDRA. Jenna successfully opposed an application for psychiatric assessment of the Mother, who had been seeing the child on a supervised basis. Jenna successfully applied for unsupervised contact. The proceedings concluded at this hearing with equal shared care.
B v H (2023): Jenna represented the Mother at a Finding of Fact hearing. The Court made multiple findings of rape, after the Father accepted that he had lied on key issues during cross-examination. Jenna made submissions that in light of the facts of the case, the principles in Re H-N & Others [2021] EWCA Civ 448 applied and invited the Court to make a finding that the Father’s rape of the Mother amounted to controlling and coercive behaviour. The Court agreed and made this finding.
N v P (2022): Jenna represented the Father at a 3 day Finding of Fact hearing. Allegations were made against the Father of rape, controlling and coercive behaviour and threatening behaviour in the presence of the child. Further allegations were made that during the course of proceedings the Father had been violent towards the child and had engaged in threatening behaviour towards the child. All findings against the Father of abusive behaviour were dismissed.
S v B (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing in a case where the child lived with his paternal aunt. The Social Worker did not recommend progressing contact. The mother sought for contact to be progressed to include overnight stays. After cross-examination of the Social Worker, the Judge indicated that she would order overnight stays, due to the responses provided by the Social Worker. The parties agreed a stepped order to include overnight stays.
P v S (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing, having represented the mother for over 2 years during lengthy court proceedings. The Social Worker had initially recommended overnight stays for the mother. By the time of the Final Hearing, the recommendation for overnight contact had been revoked due to a change in social worker. Furthermore, in evidence at the Final Hearing the Social Worker said that she was no longer opposing an SGO for maternal grandparents. After contested evidence, the Magistrates concluded that overnight contact was in the child’s best interests and implemented alternative weekend overnight contact in addition to extended periods of school holiday contact. The Magistrates refused to grant the application for a SGO.
Clerks
Keith Allen
Call: 2017 (Solicitor 2004)
Keith Allen
Deputy District Judge
Mental Health Tribunal Judge
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 0113 246 2600
Keith was called to the Bar in 2017 having qualified as a solicitor in 2004 and then a solicitor advocate in 2011. Keith has appeared on behalf of defendants at the Crown Court since 2011 and since being called to the Bar accepts instructions as either prosecution or defence advocate.
Reputation
Expertise
Crime
Keith has experience in dealing with cases where significant parts of the evidence are recovered from computer equipment or the internet using forensic techniques.
Keith is also experienced in dealing with defendants with mental health difficulties where assistance is required to properly communicate with clients or where disposals such as section 37/41 are being considered under the Mental Health Act.
Keith has successfully represented clients at the Court of Criminal Appeal and before the Administrative Court.
Notable Cases
Crime
CW-v-DVSA
Administrative Court – Acted as an advocate for the Driver Vehicle Standards Agency on an appeal by Case Stated in which the appellant was arguing that the continuing professional competence provisions were ultra vires and should be struck out. DVSA was successful in defending the claim
R-v-TH
Bradford CC – Acted for the defendant alleged to have stolen over £75,000 in cash from a gentleman that she cared for. The defendant was acquitted after trial.
R-v-DB
Leeds CC – Defence advocate for the lead singer of Black Lace. His confiscation order was agreed at a £1 available amount.
R-v-M
Leeds CC – Defence advocate for a man accused of making indecent images of children. Initially, the allegation was that there were over 3000 indecent images, but following defence submissions, this was reduced to around 800. At trial, Keith acted in defence of the accused who was found not guilty.
R-v-N
Leeds CC – Defended a man charged with armed robbery. A case in which the section 28 protocol applied Keith secured an acquittal after trial despite claims the man was identified as being present by eyewitnesses and forensic evidence.
R-V-P
Hull CC- Advocate for a male accused of several sexual offences against a young child. The defendant was ruled not fit to stand trial, and a finding of fact hearing took place. The jury failed to deliver a verdict on one of the four counts alleged and the defendant was sentenced to a section 37/41 hospital order.
R-v-W
Leeds CC – Acting as an advocate for a man accused of making over 150 indecent images of children. The case was listed for trial, but following representations made to the Crown by Keith the Crown reviewed the case and offered no evidence. The evidence in the case included admissions by the defendant that he had used chat rooms to contact persons over the age of 16. At early hearings, the Court had tried to claim that the defendant did not have a defence to the charge at law.
R-v-K
Leeds CC – Defence of a man accused of Section 18 assault by kicking. Despite accounts from independent witnesses and CCTV of the defendant demonstrating air kicks shortly after the incident Keith secured an acquittal after trial for the defendant who required an interpreter throughout proceedings.
Magistrates’ Court
R-v-BR
Harrogate MC – Acted for a man accused of multiple offences of criminal damage. The alleged tyre slasher was identified from CCTV by one of the victims. During the trial, Keith made several submissions to the Court on the admissibility of evidence and was ultimately able to argue that it would be unsafe for the Court to rely upon the content of the CCTV and the identifications made as a result of it. In part, these arguments were based on significant failings of the police investigation. The case attracted considerable press interest in nearly all national newspapers.
R-v-JM
Leeds MC – Acted in defence of a lady accused of neglect of her son. Following submissions made by Keith, the case was dismissed by the Court after the prosecution closed its case. Keith was instructed on this case after another firm of solicitors advised the defendant, incorrectly, to merely accept the allegation.
R-v-SW
Harrogate MC – Acted as defence solicitor for a man accused of assaulting his daughter. Keith made representations to the Crown that they should drop the case. However, the Crown reviewed the case and indicated that they would proceed despite the representations. Following cross-examination of the complainant, it was accepted that the complainant was the aggressor. Keith made submissions of no case to answer, and a not guilty verdict returned without any evidence called on behalf of the defence.
R-v-D
Leeds YC – Keith appeared before the Youth Court and argued successfully that the prosecution should be halted as an abuse of process on the basis of delay and manipulation by the CPS of the charging decision.
R- v-TM
Central Criminal Court – Provided advice and representation at the police station through to trial to Thomas Mair the man convicted of the killing of Jo Cox MP. Acted as defence solicitor throughout the trial which was allocated to the terrorism lists at the Central Criminal Court.
Clerks
Paul Canfield
Call: 2019
Paul Canfield
Master of Laws, University of Law, Birmingham (2017-2018)
Bar Professional Training Course, University of Law, Birmingham (2017-2018): VC
Graduate Diploma in Law, University of Law, London (2015-2017): Commendation
Member of The Free Speech Union
North Eastern Circuit
Master of Science, Security and Risk Management, University of Leicester (2014)
Legal Aid Number: 02HCX
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 01274 722560
Paul is a Grade 2 prosecutor and practices in crime.
He appears regularly in the Crown Court for both the prosecution and defence, and has recently appeared in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division, to represent a client in an Attorney General’s Reference in 2024.
Reputation
Expertise
Criminal
Crime Paul completed his pupillage with the Crown Prosecution Service in 2019, where he spent a period of secondment with the Attorney General’s Office reviewing unduly lenient sentences. Prior to that, he worked as a police officer for over a decade specialising in operations.In the past, Paul led research into the police response to gang-related violence and future security threats as part of his Master’s degree. The findings were later published by Springer Publishing. Paul also attended Harvard Law School where he studied the principles of negotiation, and the University of St Andrews where he undertook studies in terrorism theories and practice.
During his time studying for the Bar Professional Training Course at the University of Law he received awards that culminated in the highest mark in Plea in Mitigation and the Master of Laws prize for the pro bono element of his studies. Paul also volunteered with the Personal Support Unit at the Birmingham Civil and Family Justice Centre.
Paul’s prior involvement in police operations, coupled with his experience with the Crown Prosecution Service, not only make him an effective prosecutor but ensures that when defending he is able to bring an invaluable insight into the prosecution case. In addition, he has acquired the critical analytical skills required to effectively evaluate complex disclosure and procedure.
Notable Cases
R v AK (2025): Paul was instructed to represent a client who was found to be unfit to participate in the trial process. The client was alleged to have committed 33 offences of sexual assault. The case, without formal instructions from the client, was approached with care and dignity. There was a successful argument before the Crown Court that it wasn’t in the public interest for the Crown to proceed on all the allegations in the context of the recommendations for disposal put forward by the treating clinicians in light of four matters which had been committed separately for sentence. The argument was partly successful, but the Crown chose still to proceed on 15 allegations. Over four days, after careful cross-examination of the Prosecution’s witnesses during which the evidence was tested, Paul was able to demonstrate to the jury that the client could not have committed the act in respect of some of those allegations.
R V KY and Ors (2024): Paul, being led by Mr Hendron, successfully prosecuted 19 defendants of 24 defendants for separate conspiracies to Pervert the Course of Justice. The cases involved the first defendant, KY, running a Notice of Intended Prosecution or ‘NIP farm’ by advertising a scheme to members of the public to evade penalty points. The remaining defendants were customers of the scheme. https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/24770310.11-people-sentenced-speeding-fine-avoidance-scam/ .
R v H (2024) (Court of Appeal - Attorney General’s Reference): Represented a client whose sentence had been referred by the Attorney General in order for a sentence imposed by the Crown Court to be reviewed.
R v R (2024): Paul was instructed to represent a client with learning difficulties in a four day trial that involved the pre-recorded evidence of a child complainant, where a series of sexual acts allegedly had been committed upon her by her brother. Paul was able to undermine the credibility of the prosecution’s case, resulting in acquittals for his client.
R v K (2024): Paul represented a client accused of a number of offences including rape, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, strangulation and coercive and controlling behaviour within a marital relationship. Preparing for trial involved an expert being instructed to review the client’s phone once it had been released by the police in order to undermine the credibility of the allegations. The client was acquitted on all nine counts.
R v R and R (2024): Secured acquittals for the second defendant following a trial that involved an allegation of administering cannabis or spice in order to rape the complainant.
R v B (2023): Paul represented a client accused of Witness Intimidation and other matters. Following a successful Application to Exclude the pre-recorded evidence of one witness under S78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, and cross-examination of the remaining witness, after a half-time finding by the judge his lay client was acquitted of all allegations.
R v M (2023): Instructed by Mr Chowdhury from Highgate Solicitors, Paul represented a client who faced a seven count indictment covering historic sexual offences, which included three counts of rape, Paul was able to secure acquittals on four of the seven counts. Two acquittals were secured following a successful half-time submission that followed careful cross-examination of the complainant. The submission of no case to answer covered the relevant law at the time and the presumptions based on the age of the defendant when the allegations took place. Also, doli incapax was a live issue and properly placed before the court as a subsidiary argument which avoided the indictment being amended.
R v B (2023) - Paul successfully secures acquittals after trial for his client who faced two historic allegations of Engaging in Sexual Activity in the Presence of a Child.
R v N and P (2023): Paul secured convictions for producing cannabis after a five day trial involving two defendants. Both defendants were found in a cannabis farm with an estimated value of cannabis of up to £475,000.
R v I (2023): Paul successfully secured an acquittal for his client accused of rape following a half-time submission.
R v B (2023): Paul, having been instructed by Michelle Wood of Blackwells Solicitors secured an acquittal on 3 January 2023 for a 80 year old client that had been accused of strangling his neighbour after several inconsistencies with the prosecution’s case were highlighted.
R v N (2022): While represting a client accused of burglary, Paul raised several issues with potential breaches of Code D of PACE and that the enhanced images provided by the Prosecution further supported the defence expert’s findings, that his client hadn’t committed the offence. The Prosecution offered no evidence on day 2 of the trial.
R v M (2022): Client accused of Threatening Another with a Bladed Article where three witnesses had alleged that the client had threatened another person with a knife — Instructed by Alex White of Alastair Bateman Solicitors. Paul and those that instructed him were able to establish and follow lines of enquiry that the police had neglected to pursue, including further witnesses and CCTV evidence that hadn’t been seized. Once this undermining evidence was provided to the Crown no evidence was offered after review.
R v H (2022) : Successfully opposed a pre-trial hearsay application under section 116(2)(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, resulting in the Crown offering no evidence on a single count of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm against the client’s ex-partner. The relevant circumstances of how the hearsay evidence had been adduced affected the fairness of the trial.
R v B (2022) : Successfully opposed a pre-trial hearsay application under section 116(2)(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 by the Crown to adduce several pieces of hearsay evidence including disclosures, made to third-parties, captured on police Body Worn Cameras and within 999 calls. This resulted in the Crown offering no evidence on six counts alleging Assault and Making Threats to Kill against the client.
R v M (2022): A defendant had been charged with driving offences along with possession of a bladed article. Through robust cross-examination of the arresting officer and the use of expert evidence, Paul secured acquittals on the driving offences for the client.
R v Ajmal (2022): On an appeal against sentence of 29 weeks’ immediate imprisonment for Possession of a Bladed Article and multiple counts of drugs’ possession, Paul demonstrated to the appeal court that the sentence had been manifestly excessive. It was reduced to a 12-month Community Order with requirements.
R v Geddes (2021): Paul secured a conviction for Wounding with Intent against a defendant. This required numerous disclosure requests having to be addressed during the trial process after the defendant decided to represent himself. https://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/crime/rastrick-thug-jailed-for-10-years-after-causing-life-threatening-injuries-to-woman-trapped-in-debt-3367321
R v Butt (2021): Prosecution junior (led by Stephen Wood QC) prosecuted the defendant for Murder and two matters of Attempted Wounding with Intent. The case involved numerous witnesses who all saw the events unfold as the defendant used a motor car to run over his victim. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-56860006
R v Gedge (2021): Conviction secured against a defendant who threatened to kill his uncle as he robbed him at knifepoint in his own home. https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/violent-criminal-locked-up-for-ten-years-for-knifepoint-robbery-of-his-uncle-at-his-home-in-leeds-3453435
Clerks
Nicola Hoskins
Call: 2019 (Solicitor 2004)
Nicola Hoskins
North Eastern Circuit
Vulnerable Witness Trained
Gray’s Inn
CPS Grade 3
Nottingham Law School – LL.B (Hons) 2.1
Guildhall University, London – Legal Practice Course, commendation
Admitted as a solicitor February 2004
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600
Nicola is a member of the criminal team and prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court in all areas of crime.
Nicola is a Grade 3 prosecutor.
Before coming to the Bar, Nicola was a solicitor and was admitted in 2004.
Reputation
GDPR and Criminal Litigation
Sentencing Guidelines Update
Previously Nicola was a freelance trainer and delivered seminars for CLT and GC Legal on topics such as youth justice and licensing.
Expertise
Grade 3 Crown Prosecutor. Regularly prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court in matters involving serious violence, weapons, drugs, road traffic, robbery, burglary, handling stolen goods, fraud, perverting the course of justice, sexual allegations and domestic violence including controlling/coercive behaviour. Nicola also prosecutes on behalf of local authorities in matters such as animal welfare and food labelling regulations.
Nicola qualified as a solicitor in 2004, acting as a regulatory prosecutor in matters including planning, licensing, Trading Standards, Environmental Health and food safety. She went on to advise banks and others on regulatory and compliance issues. She is described as having a reassuring presence together with a personable and practical approach.
Notable Cases
R v H (2024): Bradford Crown Court. Nicola Hoskins and Fen Greatley-Hirsch secured suspended sentences for father and son clients who were charged with intent to pervert the course of justice. ttps://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/24427369.lying-father-sons-story-fell-apart-police-dug-deeper/
R v S and S (2024): Bradford Crown Court. Successful prosecution of two siblings who produced a fraudulent codicil to their father’s will, which had the effect of excluding two other siblings from a share in the estate. Both received custodial sentences.
R v K (2024): York Crown Court. Prosecution of a fraudster who had created a scam claiming refunds from LNER whilst selling on the ‘refunded’ ticket for profit. In the course of the proceedings he produced a document purporting to be from a doctor at the LGI with the aim of reducing his sentence, which was investigated and charged as an attempt to pervert the course of justice. https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/24235323.paul-king-jailed-defrauding-lner-rail-tickets/
R v F (2024): Newcastle Crown Court. Led in complex rape trial by Peter Makepeace KC, in which the complainant had passed away prior to the trial. The defence put up many technical obstacles to prevent the case proceeding before a jury, including objecting to hearsay evidence and arguing abuse of process, but these were defeated by detailed and carefully researched submissions on nuanced legal points.
R v M (2024): Bradford Crown Court. Represented a client facing a third conviction for supplying Class A drugs, and hence the minimum term of seven years’ custody. The judge was persuaded to depart from the guidelines and imposed a term of four years instead.
R v K (2023): Bradford Crown Court. Represented one of two defendants prosecuted for possession of Class A drugs with intent to supply. Client acquitted whilst the other defendant received an immediate custodial sentence.
R v S (2023): Bradford Crown Court. Successful prosecution of breach of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order where the defence was one of reasonable excuse following a technical issue with the wording of the original order. Jury convicted and an immediate sentence of custody was imposed.
R v H (2023): Client facing a custodial term of around five years for child sexual offences; the court was persuaded to depart from the sentencing guidelines and imposed a community order instead.
R v G (2023): Secured an acquittal for a taxi driver accused of sexually assaulting a young female passenger.
EA v A (2023): Secured a suspended sentence for sustained breaches of environmental regulations, together with a much reduced contribution to the prosecution’s costs.
R v G and others (2023): Successful application to dismiss in respect of client charged with affray at a football match.
R v S (2023): Obtained a suspended sentence in a case of discharging a firearm in public.
R v H and N (2022): Successful prosecution of two individuals for inflicting grievous bodily harm where the issue was identification.
R v S (2022): Acquittal of client on a rape charge within 30 minutes of jury retiring.
R v S (2022): Acquittal of client on a charge of taking a car without consent following a successful exclusion application under s78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
R v L (2022): Prosecution for obstruction of bailiff in the course of his duty and common assault; also assault of two police officers who came to assist the bailiff. Defendant acquitted of all charges when it was proved that the bailiff did not comply with his codes of practice, and accordingly the police officers were not acting in accordance with PACE.
R v F (2022): Prosecution for incurring 6 speeding offences in 10 days, potentially facing a total of 18 points. Court was successfully persuaded that the sentencing guidelines could be set aside and a short discretionary disqualification was imposed instead of points, which meant the client avoided ‘totting up’ and any points at all.
Clerks
Fen Greatley-Hirsch
Call: 2018
Fen Greatley-Hirsch
LLM Legal Practice (Barristers) – BPP Law School
Adv. LLM Public International Law – Leiden University
LLB Law with French Law – University of Warwick
ADM-ODR International Qualified Civil Commercial Mediator
Baron Dr ver Heyden de Lancey Prize (Middle Temple)
The Queen Mother Scholarship (Middle Temple)
White Rose (WRoCAH) Doctoral Scholarship (Arts and Humanities Research Council)
Grade 3 Prosecutor
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600
Fen joined Chambers in December 2020 after completing a common law pupillage under the supervision of Giles Bridge and Paul Smith.
He accepts instructions in family and criminal cases and is available for consultation in conference or written advice.
Fen’s practice is shaped by his experiences in academia and working in client-facing roles with a several national and international charitable organisations, including Citizens Advice Bureau, the Free Representation Unit, and Nightline.
This work put him in regular contact with individuals from all walks of life and particularly vulnerable populations, young people, persons with disabilities and mental health conditions, and non-native English speakers. As a result, Fen understands and responds to a wide range of client needs. He approaches all matters with the utmost commitment to client care and is often praised for taking the time to ensure clients’ questions and concerns are addressed and that they feel fully represented.
Fen’s academic research focuses on issues of mental and legal capacity in criminal law using vulnerability theory. He has served on the editorial board of academic journals, worked as a research assistant for an NGO conducting strategic human rights litigation, and delivered papers at academic conferences around the world. As such, he is is able to build and present complex information and arguments in a clear and accessible way.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Fen accepts instructions in private and public Children Act proceedings at all stages, from first hearings to final hearings. A well-rounded practice sees him represent parents, Local Authorities and intervenors alike.
He has a real strength in client care and is often commended for ensuring his clients fully understand the developments in and prospects of their case and leave hearings feeling heard and fully represented.
Fen has gained particular expertise in contested and fact-finding hearings, assisted by a keen eye for detail and a forensic approach honed through criminal practice.
He regularly deals with cases involving allegations of a very serious nature – such as domestic violence, non-accidental injuries, and sexual harm – and does so with sensitivity and tact.
Fen has considerable experience representing vulnerable clients, including young persons, persons with disabilities, those with mental health issues, and those who do not speak English. He welcomes instructions in cases involving non-traditional families and those with international or intercultural elements.
Crime
Fen both prosecutes and defends at all stages – pre-trial, trial, sentence, and appeal.
He regularly appears in courts across the North Eastern and Northern Circuits in relation to the following types of offences:
- Assaults (up to and including s18);
- Road traffic;
- Public order (affrays);
- Dishonesty (handling stolen goods; burglary; robbery);
- Drugs offences (possession with intent to supply; production);
- Sexual offences (sexual assault; indecent images)
Fen is a member of the CPS General Crime Panel at Grade 3.
For the last couple of years he has been building his Crown Court trial practice and welcomes defence instructions.
He has completed the vulnerable witness training and, particularly given his experience dealing with similar matters in the family courts, is well-equipped to defend in rape, sexual assault and other such sensitive matters.
More generally, Fen’s background in academia has equipped him with the ability to quickly process and familiarise himself with large volumes of documents, as well as to make complex information accessible to a lay audience. It has also given him the research skills to locate useful case law that sometimes makes all the difference.
He has been praised by solicitors, benches and clients themselves for his skilled and sensitive witness handling and an ability to resonate with juries.
Fen builds rapports with clients easily, which quickly allows him to elicit the information needed both to build the strongest case and to address the opposing one effectively.
He has a keen eye for detail and in evidential hearings is particularly adept at witness handling, cross-examining with a forensic approach honed through criminal practice.
Fen has considerable experience representing vulnerable clients, including young persons, persons with disabilities, those with mental health issues, and those who do not speak English.
Notable Cases
R v X - Leeds Crown Court (Defence 2025)
Fen Greatley-Hirsch secured acquittal. Client at trial charged with multiple counts of voyeurism (s67 Sexual Offences Act 2003) over a 3-year period. Significant issues relating to the admissibility of several key aspects of the Crown’s case - including a video recorded interview and forensic downloads – in the context of adherence to ABE guidance, chain of custody, and principles of character evidence.
R v H - Bradford Crown Court (Defence 2024)
Fen and Nicola Hoskins secured a suspended sentence for father and son clients who were charged with intent to pervert the course of justice.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/24427369.lying-father-sons-story-fell-apart-police-dug-deeper/
R v Shaw - Leeds Crown Court (Prosecution 2023)
Prosecuted 'professional burglar' who was sentenced to 32 months imprisonment. https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/career-criminal-rammed-police-car-as-he-drove-professional-burglary-team-around-leeds-4422603
R v Ndokajwas - Bradford Crown Court (Prosecution 2023)
Prosecuted man after cannabis farm worth £670k found. Marsel Ndokajwas was sentenced to two years imprisonment for the production of cannabis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-67571625
R v X - Youth Court (Defence 2023)
Fen defended in the Youth Court in a serious sexual assault trial.The trial involved child witnesses and implementing the s28 procedure. Fen made a successful submission of no case to answer, which prevented the need for the defendant to give evidence. https://www.broadwayhouse.co.uk/news/fen-greatley-hirsch-youth-court-2023
R v X - Leeds Crown Court (Defence 2023)
Fen Greatley-Hirsch Secures Suspended Sentence for his Client in a Serious Three-handed Affray. https://www.broadwayhouse.co.uk/news/fen-greatley-hirsch-secures-suspended-sentence
Clerks
Lucy Coen
Call: 2019
Lucy Coen
BPTC, BPP Leeds, 2017–2019 (Very Competent)
GDL, University of Law, 2015–2017 (Distinction)
MA Peace Studies, University of Bradford, 2011 (Distinction)
BA Modern History and Politics, University of Liverpool, 2007–2010 (2:1)
Young Legal Aid Lawyers
Family Law Bar Association
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600 / 01274 722560
Lucy Coen is an Immigration specialist at Broadway House Chambers.
Lucy accepted tenancy at Broadway House Chambers after successfully completing her pupillage in December 2020 under the supervision of Giles Bridge and Paul Smith.
Lucy was called to the Bar in 2019 after completing the BPTC part-time at BPP Leeds. Prior to the Bar, Lucy worked for a number of years in a variety of roles in the not-for-profit sector, including working as an immigration caseworker, an Independent Sexual Violence Advisor [ISVA] and a support worker at a national children’s charity. As such she has wealth of experience working with a range of people and is particularly adept at communicating with lay clients.
Reputation
Articles
Immigration Status of a Parent in an Application for a Child Arrangements Order by Lucy CoenImmigration Matters: Visitors who Attempt to Stay in the UK Permanently by Lucy Coen
Recent Webinars Include
Immigration applications for children in care
Expertise
Immigration
Prior to the Bar, Lucy worked at a local charity as an immigration caseworker, where she drafted further submissions for clients who could not obtain legal aid as a result of their cases not meeting the merits test. She also regularly appeared in the First-Tier Tribunal once further submissions had been granted a right of appeal. Whilst in this role she gave legal advice at weekly clinic in Leeds providing much needed pro-bono assistance to migrants.
From 2015 to 2017 Lucy worked as an Independent Child Trafficking Advocate [ICTA] at Barnardo’s across the North of England. Lucy was the first ICTA in the North of England to undertake this role and worked closely with a variety of agencies including the police, social care and immigration practitioners to ensure that young people identified as having been trafficked were properly supported. Lucy’s prior experience working with young people and care-leavers makes her particularly well-suited to representing unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.
Lucy continues her commitment to vulnerable clients by undertaking pro-bono advocacy for the Manuel Bravo Project and Bail for Immigration Detainees.
Lucy is available to advise and represent clients with all immigration and asylum matters and works collaboratively with solicitors to ensure a firm understanding of the issues in a case prior to entering court.
Notable Cases
**Immigration case 2022**
Represented client from Iraq. Earlier negative credibility findings. Appeal granted on Article 8 grounds
**Asylum case 2022**
Represented client from Ethiopia. Appeal granted
**Asylum case 2021**
Represented client from Eritrea where nationality was disputed. Earlier negative credibility findings. Appeal granted
**Asylum case 2020**
Represented client from Nigeria. Client vulnerable due to mental and physical health difficulties. Appeal granted.
**Asylum case 2020**
Represented client from Nigeria. Appeal granted on Article 8 grounds
Clerks
Emily Hughes
Call: 2014
Emily Hughes
Year of Call: 2014
Inner Temple Scholar
BPTC, BPP Leeds 2013-14 (Very Competent)
LLB Law, University of Leeds 2010-13 (2:1)
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600 / 01274 722560
Emily accepted tenancy at Broadway House Chambers in December 2021 after successfully completing her Civil and Family Law Pupillage.
Emily has a busy practice and is available to take instructions in all areas covered by the Business, Property and Probate Team and Family Team.
Reputation
Expertise
Emily is experienced in Family and Civil Law
Business Property and Probate
Prior to commencing pupillage, Emily acquired six years of freelance advocacy experience in a wide range of civil litigation. Her practice encompassed the following areas: commercial and residential property, contract disputes, landlord and tenant, mortgage repossession, personal injury, credit hire, consumer credit, insolvency and debt recovery. She therefore had a working knowledge in these areas from which her practice within the Business, Property and Probate Team is developing.
Emily has considerable experience in a number of areas covered by the Business, Property and Probate Team and frequently appears in the County Court on behalf of both Claimants and Defendants. She is confident in dealing with all levels of contested applications and costs disputes. Emily is able to provide straightforward advice and draft pleadings within these practice areas.
Family
Emily commenced pupillage under the supervision of Kerry Barker in January 2021 and was involved in all aspects of family proceedings. Within public and private law, she has assisted with particularly difficult and complex cases involving preventable death, non-accidental injuries, sexual abuse, domestic violence and mental health aspects along with cross-jurisdictional elements up to High Court level. Emily has quickly established a strong practice of her own in these areas and is confident in dealing with multi-faceted cases.
Emily has also developed a keen interest in financial remedy cases, having accompanied a number of senior specialist practitioners in mid and high value cases during pupillage. She has also gained a valuable insight into needs-based cases requiring creative, practical solutions along with those involving family businesses and intervenors. Emily has established a broad practice within the Family Team and is keen to develop her financial remedy practice further. She is happy to advise in conference and in writing.
Clerks