Roger Bickerdike
Call: 1986
Roger Bickerdike
LLB, Barrister
Chambers & Partners Ranking Barrister Band 1
Legal 500 Leading Individual
Contact
T: 01274 722560 or 0113 246 2600
Roger is undoubtedly one of the North Eastern Circuit’s most experienced and highly regarded family law specialists. Practising exclusively in family work, he is particularly renowned for his expertise in mid and high value financial remedy cases and private law children matters, including both internal and international relocation. Roger also has considerable experience of appellate work, especially in the Court of Appeal.
Reputation
‘An authority in family law, who is particularly adept at handling complicated financial remedy proceedings. He also undertakes private law children work and has experience of appellate advocacy, notably in the Court of Appeal. A fearless advocate. I’ve seen him determined to get a point across when odds are against him, and his paperwork is excellent. He can deal with the most challenging and difficult cases’ (Chambers and Partners, 2020)
“He is an excellent advocate and has the ear of the court because his approach is pragmatic and commercial.” “He is proactive in setting expectations and he’s not a last-minute person. He’s very responsive and very good at what he does.” “His lay client-handling skills are second to none. An authority in family law who is particularly adept at handling complicated financial remedy proceedings. He is further noted for his work on spousal maintenance as well as children matters such as contact arrangement orders. He is experienced across several court levels” (Chambers and Partners, 2021)
"Roger is a brilliant advocate with tremendous attention for detail and who is really well regarded among the judiciary." "A standout financial remedies counsel in the region." "He is proactive, well prepared, robust and a fearless advocate. He provides clear and sound advice on complicated issues, manages clients' expectations well and negotiates good outcomes in court." (Chambers & Partners, 2022)
”The consummate advocate who is more than willing to roll his sleeves up should the case require it. He is a pragmatist at heart and clients value his commerciality. He will fight for what is right for a client’ (Legal 500, 2021)
Roger possesses a finely tuned ability to judge the feeling of a court and so deliver insightful and meaningful advice. That same intuitive knowledge enables him to deliver very effective advocacy’ (Legal 500, 2022)
‘A fearless advocate, Roger is approachable and gains the trust and confidence of clients from the outset. He can accurately read a case and the approach a court or judge is likely to take, and tailors his approach accordingly.' (Legal 500, 2023)
'Roger Bickerdike is an authority in family law who is particularly adept at handling complicated financial remedy proceedings. He is further noted for his work on spousal maintenance as well as children matters such international relocation. He is experienced across several court levels. (Chambers and Partners, 2023)
“Roger Bickerdike is an authority in family law who is particularly adept at handling complicated financial remedy proceedings. He is further noted for his work on spousal maintenance as well as children matters such as international relocation. He is experienced across several court levels. Incredibly bright and an amazing advocate. He is good with clients and very fair. Exceptional counsel. He is thorough and an extremely good advocate, who is very good with clients, helping them to understand complicated matters. He swiftly identifies and grasps the points that the outcome will turn on. He looks at a case from every angle before deciding a strategy and he is always spot on.” (Chambers & Partners, 2024)
"He is exceptionally good as an advocate – he will fight a case, he rolls his sleeves up, and his advice to clients is always on the money. He has excellent judgement and knows how to get a result. Roger is a superb financial remedy practitioner. He has amazing attention to detail and fights for clients. He's tenacious when necessary but pragmatic and commercially aware." (Chambers & Partners, 2025)
'Roger is highly intellectual and forensic in his research and case preparation. He commends great respect in the courtroom and he is an exceptional advocate. He exudes gravitas and experience and is on top of every detail. He never misses a point and is always up for the fight.' ‘top drawer’ Roger Bickerdike is well-versed in advising on high-value financial remedy cases. A phenomenal advocate who is very impressive on his feet. Roger Bickerdike is ‘detailed and precise’ (Legal 500, 2025)
'Roger is a dynamic, persuasive and skilled barrister who you would want on your side. He is not scared of rolling his sleeves up and doing the hard yards to ensure the right outcome.' (legal 500,2026)
'Roger Bickerdike is an authority in family law who is particularly adept at handling complicated financial remedy proceedings. He is further noted for his work on spousal maintenance as well as children matters such as international relocation. He is experienced across several court levels.Roger Bickerdike is confident, realistic and calm.' (Chambers & Partners, 2026)
Expertise
Family
Areas of Expertise
• Financial Remedy: specialist in mid and high value claims
• Children Law: private law, including internal and international relocating.
He has been involved in over 30 reported cases and has presented at many seminars on various aspects of both financial remedy and children law.
Notable Cases
WS v HS (Appeal - interim sale of matrimonial home) [2018] EWFC 11
W v H (Financial Remedies: Pensions) [2021] EWFC B63
Clerks
Aelred Hookway
Call: 1990
Aelred Hookway
LLB
Member of Gray’s Inn
Family Law Bar Association
Contact
T: 01274 722560 or 0113 246 26000
Aelred has spent over 30 years practicing in family law and now specialises in private law children. He can accept instructions on a direct access basis.
Reputation
Aelred has a reputation for bringing a pragmatic but fair approach to his cases and will often secure a negotiated solution that may have eluded others. An insightful and effective advocate when circumstances require. He has been described as ‘an oasis of calm in stormy seas’
(Legal 500 2019)
Expertise
Family Law.
Aelred accepts instructions on all aspects of private law children work and has accreditation to accept instructions on a direct access basis
Clerks
Guy Swiffen
Call: 1991
Guy Swiffen
BA (Hons) History, Reading University
L.Dip. City University, London
Legal 500
Chambers and Partners
Contact
T: 01274 722560 or 0113 246 2600
Guy has been at the Bar since 1991 and has practised exclusively in the field of children law for over 20 years. He began his career in London and then moved to the North of England in the late 1990s. Since then he has forged a heavyweight practice which takes him to all parts of the North of England dealing with many of the most complex cases being heard in the region. His reputation is very high amongst both his peers and the Judiciary, and he is recognised in Chambers and Partners and the Legal 500 year on year.
He has been described as a “bright and stunningly good junior.” He is known to be an incisively devastating cross examiner. Over the years his practise has taken him to developing the forensic skills to challenge the analyses and opinions of medical experts in the witness box. Complimenting his forensic skills is an excellent knowledge of the legislation and case law. He is happy to operate at all court levels: he has had the experience of taking a case all the way to the House of Lords. He prides himself on having a friendly and approachable relationship with clients and solicitors alike.
He often acts against Silks as a leading Junior (leading both Junior Counsel and solicitors).
Reputation
"Guy is a very experienced barrister who provides exemplary client care and legal knowledge." (Band 1, Chambers and Partners, 2026)
"Guy is an absolute powerhouse when it comes to what he does. He brings to every matter a wealth of information and expertise, he is methodical when it comes to prep, approachable, knowledgeable, and he is heard and respected in court by his peers and the judiciary."(Legal 500, 2026)
"He's very easy to work with, responsive, and very good at what he does." (Chambers and Partners, 2025)
“Guy is exceptional. When instructed on complex matters, his knowledge and experience of such cases is unsurpassed. He is always totally prepared, level headed, extremely professional but also approachable, emphatic and attentive to clients. His cross examination is cool, calm yet completely masterful.” (Legal 500, 2025)
“Guy Swiffen is well regarded for his ability to handle an eclectic mix of children-related work, ranging from abuse allegations and child injuries to care proceedings. He regularly acts for parents, intervenors and local authorities alike, which further illustrates his holistic practice. An excellent advocate with good technical knowledge of the law. Guy has very good client skills and is able to cut through complex cases with ease. A superb and skilful advocate who is excellent on his feet." (Chambers and Partners, 2024)
“Guy is very experienced and deals with high-level public law children cases" (Chambers and Partners, 2023)
“An unflappable barrister. His forthright manner and confidence sets all in the court room at ease. He has a keen analytical mind" (Legal 500, 2023)
“Ability to handle an eclectic mix of children-related work, ranging from abuse allegations and child injuries to care proceedings. He regularly acts for parents, intervenors and local authorities alike, which further illustrates his holistic practice. "Guy Swiffen is very good in complex medical cases." (Chambers & Partners, 2022)
"Guy is a tenacious and fearless advocate. Excellent with clients. His persuasive powers are second to none. Ability to handle an eclectic mix of children-related work, ranging from abuse allegations and child injuries to care proceedings. He regularly acts for parents, intervenors and local authorities alike, which further illustrates his holistic practice. Guy Swiffen is very good in complex medical cases." (Legal 500, 2022)
Guy regularly leads webinar and seminars on behalf of Broadway House Chambers’ Children Team. Talks include:
• 2022 so far : latest ABE guidance and recent case law
• ‘Just 17, do you know what it means?”: recent case law
• “Aftermath of B-S : where are we now?”
• “Child abduction and habitual residence : what is the test ?”
• Private law case law update
• The implications of Re R in the post B-S landscape
Expertise
Family
Public Law
In care proceedings he has extensive experience in representing local authorities throughout the North of England in complex proceedings (including against Leading Counsel). He also has a substantial body of work representing parents and other family members (including those with physical and learning disabilities) as well as Guardians and the Official Solicitor. His practise often deals with child fatalities as well as physical, sexual and emotional abuse.
Private Law
In addition he has a substantial practice in all aspects of Private Law Children Work. This includes applications to remove children from the jurisdiction, Child Abduction, and applications for Child Arrangement Orders (including internal relocation). He has extensive experience in making emergency applications (often before High Court Judges) as well as dealing with issues of a jurisdictional complexity.
Notable Cases
P and Q ( minors ) ( inadequate local authority assessment ) [2024] EWFC 153 ( risk assessment by the LA deemed inadequate – consideration of whether there should be further assessment balanced against the consequent delay in finalising the proceedings)
P and Q ( minors ) ( care orders : placement at home ) [2024] WWFC 154 ( review of the recent authorities on placing children at home under a Care Order versus a Supervision Order. Consideration of the test of “exceptionality”).
BC v a local authority and others [2024] EWHC 1639 ( law on changing the name - including first name - involving a 16 year old child subject to a care order where the LA and the parents opposed the change).
Re S ( a child ) ( 2010 ) EWCA Civ 1363
Whether the local authority had breached the mother’s Human Rights by the circumstances in which it had removed her child from her care whilst she was in prison
Re A ( contact order ) ( 2010 ) 2FLR 577
Consideration of whether child should have own solicitor instead of representation of interests via a Children’s Guardian : cost element relevant
O –v- N, re B [2003] IUK House of Lords 18 [2003] 1FLR 1169
Correct approach taken by the court where the threshold criteria established but the identity of the perpetrator is uncertain
Re B ( non accidental injury : compelling medical evidence ) [2002] 2FLR 1133
Courts’ approach on determining findings in respect of the threshold criteria and evaluating contradictory medical and lay evidence
Re G [2002] 2FCR 377
Contact orders to be made in care and freeing proceedings
Clerks
Dornier Whittaker
Call: 1994
Dornier Whittaker
BA (Hons) Kings College, London
City University (Diploma in Law)
Inns of Court School of Law
Middle Temple Queen Mothers Scholar
Children Law Arbitrator
Resolution
FLBA
Contact
T: 01274 722560 / 0113 246 2600
Dornier is a highly sought after private children and financial remedy specialist. With over 30 years of experience, Dornier has a wealth of experience in complex relocation cases, intractable children disputes and is recognised for her knowledge in mid-high value financial relief cases, especially those involving companies, partnerships, farms and “hidden wealth”.
Dornier prides herself on her open and easy to approach manner with both solicitors and clients and is a firm believer in practical, no-nonsense advice. She is consistently ranked as a leading junior in the legal directories.
“Dornier is full of confidence and has amazing client care and cross-examination skills. She combines sharp legal insight with a calm, reassuring presence in court, making her a go-to choice for complex or sensitive matters. Dornier works so hard for her clients and likewise her instructing solicitor. She is without a doubt one of the best advocates on the local circuit. (Chambers & Partners, 2026).
Highly supportive of all forms of non-court dispute resolution, Dornier is regularly instructed to act on behalf of clients at round tables meetings, private FDR’s, early neutral evaluations and arbitrations. She has recently qualified as a children law arbitrator and looks forward to supporting parties in reaching non-court based resolutions.
Dornier welcomes instructions under the Direct Access scheme, providing advice and representation direct to the public.
Reputation
Chambers and Partners
“Dornier is full of confidence and has amazing client care and cross-examination skills. She combines sharp legal insight with a calm, reassuring presence in court, making her a go-to choice for complex or sensitive matters. Dornier works so hard for her clients and likewise her instructing solicitor. She is without a doubt one of the best advocates on the local circuit."(2026)
"She is an excellent advocate. She can see through a complex and emotive matter and can find a way forward. She is very hands on, robust and kicks a case into order. She is a breath of fresh air and pulls out the stops. She is well prepared, has a very good client care manner and is approachable. She is unflappable even with the trickiest of opponents." (2025)
“Dornier Whittaker is a highly experienced practitioner with a practice covering finance and children matters. Her work ranges from contact arrangement orders to financial remedies and maintenance payment variations. She regularly acts for high net worth individuals." (2024)
“Dornier Whittaker is a highly experienced practitioner with a practice covering finance and children matters. Her work ranges from contact arrangement orders to financial remedies and maintenance payment variations. She regularly acts for high net worth individuals.Dornier is wonderful with clients. She is reasonable and realistic in negotiations, and a top court performer. Dornier is a pleasure to deal with. She is happy to provide additional support on cases so that the client really gets a team approach."(2023)
“She is client and lawyer friendly and takes a hands-on approach. This makes working with her a very cooperative experience for not only the client but those instructing her. She is extremely thorough, clear in her advice and proactive in managing very anxious and difficult clients. She is extremely personable with clients and sees cases through while working as a team with the instructing solicitor and the client."(2022)
“Dornier is extremely experienced and is a great all-rounder for family law. She is very client-friendly and her advice is easily understood."(2018)
“Extremely skilled in private law work relating to children as well as financial family disputes. She has previously advised on complicated separations involving farming and corporate assets, in addition to complex child relocations. She is sensible, charming and empathetic, and really excellent at managing difficult people."(2017)
Legal 500
"Dornier is without a doubt one of the most tenacious and skilled advocates on circuit; she has the ability to work with often anxious and difficult client, making them feel at ease, while offering them frank and honest advice, which is a difficult skill to master and she can do this with ease. Dornier is able to think outside the box, suggesting resolutions which other advocates would not consider, and as well as her personal skills and advocacy, she has a wealth of knowledge in the area of the law, using that knowledge to the best of her ability and adapting that knowledge to each clients needs, while being frank and honest. Dornier has a formidable presence in court, immense passion and energy, and relatable warmth. She is exceptionally good with clients."(2026)
“Dornier is assiduous in her preparation. She has a brilliantly disarming style of advocacy, as well as the ability to immediately win a client's confidence. Dornier is a tenacious advocate. Her knowledge of the law is outstanding, and she exhibits exceptional insight in handling cases.” (2025)
“Dornier adopts a very hands on approach. She is always available and puts clients at ease from the very start. She combines a no-nonsense approach with a robust and clear approach to cross-examination.Dornier is a fearless advocate. She relates very well to clients, works extremely hard for them, and is always well prepared.”(2023 & 2024)
”She is calmly reassuring with clients in what can be difficult cases. Her advice is sound and rational.”(2022)
“Specialises in private law children and financial matters.”(2020)
“She has an ability to think outside of the box and is very good on her feet.” (2017)
“She is impressive on her feet without being unpleasant or resorting to bullying.”(2025)
Seminars
Dornier delivers seminars to solicitors and other legal professionals throughout the North of England and beyond. Dornier has recently covered:
• Variation of Final Income and Capital Orders
• Internal and external relocation
• Private Children Update for Spring 2024
• A Practical Guide to Frequent Issues Encountered in Private Law Applications
• Disclosure & Pensions - Practical Tips to Aid Settlement
• Top Tips: Practice, Procedure & Preparation for the FDA, FDR and Final Hearing
• Top Tips on Practice & Procedure in Private Law Children
• Private Law Children – Essential Update 2
• Costs Update in Private Law Proceedings
Expertise
Family
Financial Remedy
Dornier’s practice involves all aspects of financial remedy. Dornier has extensive experience of representing business owners, professionals, third parties and their spouses, and has a particular interest in corporate and farming cases where the assets are up to £10m. She regularly appears in cases which involve the following issues:
- Company and business interests including valuations.
- Farming assets including valuation and liquidity.
- Cases involving significant property portfolios.
- Non-matrimonial inheritance assets.
- Significant pension assets.
- Assets located outside of the jurisdiction including company and family trusts.
Private Children
Dornier has extensive experience in all aspects of private children disputes representing mothers, fathers and other family members. She has a particular interest in the relocation of children whether within this jurisdiction or overseas, parental alienation cases and fact finding hearings involving serious allegations of domestic abuse. Her case load regularly involves the following:
- Private disputes as to child arrangements including ‘live with’ and ‘spend time with’ orders.
- Relocation of children including both within this jurisdiction and overseas.
- Parental alienation.
- Fact-finding hearings involving allegations of domestic abuse.
- Specific issue orders, re-schooling and medical issues.
Notable Cases
Private Children (2024)
Representing applicant F on shared care application to his son. F making serious concessions about abusive behaviour to M and child. 12 months of supervised contact followed by last 6 months of gradual build-up of time with child in community. F seeking 50/50 shared care following lengthy assessment by Cafcass and seeking long term PSO on grounds that M is a serious flight risk abroad. M opposing shared care alleging F still presenting risk and there should be ‘live with’ order in her favour with no intention to move abroad. Composite hearing ordered with a shared care arrangement being ordered by the court.
Private Children (2024)
Representing applicant M on her application to permanently relocate with the 3 dependent children abroad. M making application to relocate on grounds that she could not find flexible full time medical role in her area and main financial supporter of the children despite F having full time job. M has some family chosen country who she could also rely on for support. Relocation opposed by Cafcass on basis that F unlikely to see the children more than 3 to 4 times per year which would damage his relationship with them. M given permission to relocate.
Private Children (2024)
Representing applicant F on M’s application to relocate with child abroad. Complex history with M making allegations of domestic abuse by F to herself and child. F making confessions that had lost temper with both of them on 2 occasions. Court ordering supervised contact with build-up into community and extended overnights over 6-month period. M wanting to relocate permanently for family support and help with her health issues. Judge did not grant M permission to relocate and made shared care order for the child in the UK.
Financial Remedy (2024)
Representing respondent H. Four Children. Assets of £4m to divide. W and children returning to UK after 10 years abroad with property in both countries including H’s 3 figure car collection and substantial investment in bitcoin. Complexity as to future income earning capacity H working abroad and earning substantial tax free income. W seeking substantial PPs for 10 years with H’s case being that planning to move to another country to cohabit with new partner where work will pay much less.
Financial Remedy (2024)
Representing respondent W – assets of c 6m. Farming case complicated by how W should receive a fair capital award including the sale of land and assets of income from businesses both parties set up. Matter complicated by proprietary estopple application by a family member who lived in a cottage on the land and was separately represented. Lump sum of £3m to W by instalments.
Financial Remedy (2024)
Representing W in financial remedy proceedings with her son joined as Intervenor. Complex case -before issuing proceedings H and his business partner joint shareholders in company business – at FDA H disclosed transferred his shareholding son. SJE business valuation obtained – total value of company shares £3 m with H alleging nil value to himself. W applying for section 37 order, with shares to be transferred back to H. Complexity as to it being her son and how much company could afford to pay W by way of lump sum to provide a fair award. W to receive lump sum of £1.5 m through lump sum from company and property transfer.
Financial Remedy (2024)
Representing respondent H. Long marriage with 2 children. Assets base of £3m tied up in the FMH and H’s business. W off sick from work for months. SJE psychiatric and occupational therapy reports with W wanting PPs for life - alleging uncertain future income earning. H supporting phased return to work and proposing mesher order for 3-year term and thereafter clean break with W receiving all proceeds of FMH. Award made with W remaining in FMH for 5 years with PP's still then and thereafter a clean break.
Clerks
Gerald Browne
Call: 1995
Gerald Browne
Family Law Association
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
After qualifying in medicine, Gerald transferred to the law and was called to the Bar in 1995. His medical knowledge is a particular advantage in cases where medical issues are to the fore.
Gerald now has more than 25 years experience as a barrister and has practised exclusively in family law since 1999. He now focuses on children and matrimonial finance cases.
Reputation
Gerald now has more than 25 years experience as a barrister and has practised exclusively in family law since 1999.
Expertise
In children cases, Gerald regularly deals with issues of parental alienation, domestic abuse (including coercive and controlling behaviours) as well as injuries to children.
In matrimonial finance matters, he is instructed in cases in which there are expert business valuations, missing assets and arguments about housing needs.
Gerald is able to accept instructions directly from members of the public.
Notable Cases
G v G. Matrimonial finance case in which the key evidence was the expert valuation of a valuable (over £1m) police pension.
B v B. Children case in which Gerald’s client was wrongly alleged to have punched his son.
J v J. Big money matrimonial finance case in which the culture of the Travelling Community had a large impact on the analysis of the facts.
C v C. Matrimonial finance case which featured a Covid 19 affected expert valuation of a timber business.
S v S. Children case featuring a dispute between father and step-father relating to a 15 year old.
Clerks
Jayne Pye
Call: 1995 (solicitor 1985)
Jayne Pye
Deputy District Judge dealing with Civil law and Public & Private family law
Recorder dealing with Private and Public Family Law
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600 / 01274 722560
Jayne has over 30 years experience of practising family law. She was a partner and head of the family law department in a large firm of solicitors before being called to the Bar in 1995. As well as undertaking cases for clients, Jayne sits as a Deputy District Judge and Recorder determining private and public law family cases. She was Chair of the Yorkshire Family Law Bar Association for 10 years.
Reputation
“Jayne Pye has experience across public and private children cases. She is particularly well regarded for her prowess in contact arrangement orders, which often involve parties with disabilities and mental health issues. She also assists with allegations of abuse and coercive behaviour. She's fantastic to work with." (Chambers and Partners, 2025)
“An excellent advocate in court. She is very quick on her feet and represents the client really well. A class performer who is very much in control. Very good in cases. She is very robust and well prepared." (Chambers and Partners, 2024)
“A first-class child law practitioner who brings common sense to the most difficult of situations.” (Legal 500, 2023)
“Jayne's approach to client care is very impressive. She is very warm, personable, and she really engages with what the client wants to achieve. Her cross-examinations are excellent." (Chambers and Partners, 2023)
“Jayne is a strong advocate, who is able to put clients at ease through her breadth of knowledge and personable approach.” (Legal 500, 2022)
"She's an extremely well-respected barrister whose advocacy is robust and powerful. Jayne is a terrific advocate who gets to grips with all the details of a case and is proactive in formulating a strategy for her cases. She is generous with her time and thorough both in her preparation and in her feedback. She is very good with clients and strikes the balance in terms of being empathetic." (Chambers and Partners, 2022)
Expertise
Family
Jayne has worked in all areas of public and private law matters relating to children. She has conducted complex cases which involve issues of physical, sexual, emotional abuse and neglect and complicated and/or conflicting medical evidence.
Jayne is currently primarily specialising in private law children matters.
She is highly regarded for her ability to manage extensive paperwork and complex issues in a thorough and efficient manner with an eye for the relevant detail; covering extensive issues in a succinct manner. She is a formidable advocate and has a commanding presence and style in court. Jayne relates well with her clients, gaining their trust through her sensitive and straightforward approach.
She represents clients in the Court of Appeal, High Court, County Court and Family Proceedings Court and is regularly instructed by Local Authorities, parents – including young parents, children and extended family members. She also leads junior barristers and instructing solicitors in cases against QCs.
She has undertaken training in mediation.
She accepts instructions directly from members of the public.
Clerks
Zira Hussain
Call: 1998
Zira Hussain
LLB (Hons ) Law
Legal Aid Supplier Number 305RU
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Zira has practised exclusively in family law for over 20 years and has extensive court experience. Her areas of practice are private and public law children, financial remedies, domestic abuse, forced marriage and honour based violence.
Zira is a fearless, tenacious, conscientious and hardworking barrister. She is known as a fighter and is a strong advocate. She is renowned for her thorough preparation and detailed knowledge of case papers. She combines strong client care skills with robust and effective advocacy. Zira has a reputation for always going the extra mile.
Reputation
Zira is ranked in the Legal 500 for both Financial Remedy and Children work. Legal 500 states the following:
2026:
'Zira is tenacious, empathetic and really fights for her clients.'
'Zira's strengths are her attention to detail, keeping calm when discussions and advocacy becomes heated and reassuring clients as to what the key issues in the case are. She supports both the client and solicitor in difficult cases, and is on hand both before and after a hearing.'
2025:
‘A practical barrister and persuasive advocate who is incisive in cross examination’
‘A very personable junior, organised and has a great manner with clients’
2024:
‘Zira is utterly unflappable. She is a stalwart advocate who remains self assured in court’
‘Zira has an exceptional grasp of the facts in a case. Her advocacy is conducted with meticulous preparation’
‘The tenacious Zira Hussain has experience in advising on pre – nuptial agreements’
2018 “She has a great bedside manner with clients”
2019 “Very enthusiastic and a dynamic cross examiner”
Zira was shortlisted for the Family Law Award at the Yorkshire Legal awards 2021, 2022 and 2024. The Yorkshire Legal Awards is the pinnacle of professional excellence, showcasing the best and brightest lawyers, practices and firms the region has to offer.
Zira won the Family Law Award at the Yorkshire Legal Awards 2022.
Zira was also shortlisted at the Yorkshire Legal Awards 2024 in the category of Yorkshire Lawyer of the Year.
Zira was shortlisted at the prestigious Lexis Nexis Family Law Awards 2022 in the category of Family Law Junior Barrister of the Year. The Family Law Awards have firmly established themselves as a highly prestigious event, celebrating the success and achievements of family lawyers and the vital contribution that they make to society.
Zira was nominated by then Legal Services Commission for inclusion in the prestigious Muslim Women Power List 2009. The list was run and devised by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission in partnership with The Times to commend achievements of Muslim women at the top of their profession or on their way to the top and aimed to highlight their contribution to the socio-economic society.
Zira was also nominated for the European Muslim Women of Influence List 2010. Finalists were announced at a gala event in Spain which tied in with the EU Presidency.
Zira has featured in her former university’s marketing and promotional materials. Zira was featured in the Eastern Eye as an inspirational woman. Zira has also featured in a digital magazine as an empowered woman.
Zira accepts instructions to sit as a Private FDR Judge.
Expertise
Private Law Children
Zira has extensive experience in conducting hearings relating to all aspects of private law children proceedings including child arrangements orders, prohibited steps orders and specific issue orders. Zira represents mothers, fathers, grandparents and other family members. Zira also represents children through their Guardian ad Litem. Zira has a particular interest in applications for leave to remove children from the jurisdiction and applications under the Hague Convention.
Zira has been involved in cases involving complex cultural and jurisdictional issues. She has conducted lengthy finding of fact hearings in these cases. Zira is sought after counsel for findings of fact hearings due to her dynamic cross examination skills. Zira has interest in cases involving religious upbringing of children. She was led by a Silk in a complex case where the court was being asked to determine the religious upbringing of a child Re N (A Child: Religion: Jehovah’s Witness) 2011 EWHC 3737
Public Law Children
Zira has vast experience in complex and difficult public law cases. She represents local authorities, parents, Children’s Guardians and extended family members at all court levels. Zira has a detailed knowledge of the children and adoption legislation and associated case law. She has been instructed in proceedings involving the most serious types of non accidental injuries, neglect, physical, emotional and sexual abuse. Zira is well respected for the quality of her court performance and robust advocacy where necessary.
Zira has interest and experience in matters involving complex medical evidence, mental health issues, problems associated with addiction and cognitive impairment. Zira has experience of acting for those with complex psychiatric issues. She is known for her ability to engage those with complex problems and her commitment to ensuring their rights are properly recognised. She remains committed to representing the most vulnerable. Zira’s approach to vulnerable clients is always sympathetic and sensitive.
Zira has experience advising and representing parties in applications involving children giving evidence. She is also experienced in cross examining children and vulnerable witnesses. Zira has significant experience in cross examining expert witnesses including psychiatrists and psychologists.
Financial Remedies
Zira undertakes all types of work relating to resolving financial issues between divorcing couples. She represents husband, wives and intervenors in proceedings in the Family Court and the High Court.
Zira has experience in dealing with straightforward to complex financial remedy cases including applications under s37 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, third parties claiming beneficial interests in matrimonial assets, land and foreign property and maintenance pending suit applications.
Zira has experience of dealing with cases involving variation and capitalisation of maintenance, applications to set aside consent orders, appeals in financial remedy proceedings and applications under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. Zira has experience in cases involving consideration and drafting of pre nuptial agreements. She was instructed to draft a pre nuptial agreement for a premier league professional footballer.
Zira is well placed due to her experience in the field of private law children matters to deal with those cases where issues of child arrangements are tied up with the issue of what orders the court should make in respect of the former matrimonial home.
Zira welcomes instructions at the early stages of the proceedings and would wish to see a case through from the First Directions Appointment to Final Hearing in order to provide informed and focused representation at every stage in the proceedings. She will advise realistically, practically and negotiate a settlement where it is in her client’s interests to do so. She will always advise on commerciality of proceedings
Domestic Abuse
Zira is renowned for her experience in the area of domestic abuse. She has the ability to deal with complex and serious domestic abuse cases. Zira represents both alleged victims and alleged perpetrators of such abuse and has conducted lengthy findings of fact hearings. Zira has extensive experience of applications under the Family Law Act 1996 including contested non molestation orders and occupation orders. Zira is known for her meticulous preparation and being able to quickly and expertly get to the core of the dispute and ensure her client receives the best and most robust representation.
Outside of work Zira has chaired a workshop which investigated the experiences of BAME women in accessing legal aid in domestic abuse cases. The ultimate aim of the consultation was to influence proposed legal aid reforms and gather ideas to improve access to legal aid and access to information. The consultation resulted in the publication of a national report titled “ Report on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) Women, Domestic Abuse and Access to Legal Aid”
Forced Marriage and Female Genital Mutilation
Zira has particular interest in applications for forced marriage protection orders and female genital mutilation orders having advised and represented local authorities and the police in making applications as well as representing respondents to such applications.
Notable Cases
Re N ( A Child: Religion: Jehovah’s Witness) 2011 EWHC 3737
Clerks
Joanne O’Shea
Call: 2000
Joanne O’Shea
Middle Temple
FLBA
Direct Access
Accredited Mediator
Vulnerable Witness Trained
Legal Aid Supplier Number 942MD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Joanne O’Shea practises exclusively in Family Law.
Joanne is an experienced family practitioner who is regularly instructed in cases of considerable complexity covering the full spectrum of Children Act proceedings where she represents parents/ grandparents and guardians ad litem. Joanne has specialised in Children Act proceedings for over 15 years and has an insightful and sensitive approach while robustly representing her clients to achieve the best outcomes.
Joanne is able to distil the real issues in a case quickly and is an accomplished negotiator achieving sensible realist outcomes for clients both by agreement and via litigation.
There is a frequent overlap between Children Act and criminal proceedings where Joanne’s previous practice in crime gives her further insight and advantage.
Joanne is a well-respected member of the Family Team at Broadway House Chambers; she has extensive and broad experience in terms of her legal knowledge and client care. Joanne has a depth and breadth of experience in terms of range of cases undertaken and is able to draw on and share those necessary insights when advising clients.
Joanne’s experience as a practitioner enables her to be incisive, practical and pragmatic in order to resolve cases effectively for clients including resolving matters by way of agreed orders with represented and non-represented parties.
Joanne is registered with the Bar Council to undertake direct access work.
Reputation
Joanne hosts seminars for Broadway House Chambers. Joanne speaks at the Family Law Annual Conference and discusses care and private children in the family law webinar series. Seminars have included but are not limited to:
• Children Act Updates
• Private Law: Parental Alienation from a Practitioner’s Perspective
• Role of courts and social workers in care proceedings; role of Official Solicitor
Client testimonials:
“Joanne was amazing, she really is a talented barrister, and so considerate and easy to work with. I really appreciated working with her.”
“Client over the moon with the outcome.”
“Joanne was amazing and achieved everything I wanted.”
“Thorough and searching in cross examination whilst being tactful and sensitive.”
Expertise
Private Law
Joanne has a wealth of experience in representing parents and children in all private law matters at all court levels ranging from non-molestation and occupation orders, s8 /child arrangements orders/91(14) orders, internal and international relocation to cases, same sex parent cases where legal parenthood is raised by a party as an issue, to complex multi party fact find cases where alienation and fabricated sexual abuse allegations feature..
Public Law
Joanne undertakes a wide range of Public Law work; she represents parents and children at all levels including at High Court and Court of Appeal. She has a wide range of experience in all key areas which include FGM, inflicted injuries and neglect cases. She has also conducted public law proceedings through the Official Solicitor.
Notable Cases
West Yorkshire (2024)
Child arrangements order application by F. Representing father. Mother opposed the application. Mother sought fact find. Proceeded to fact find. Very limited findings made. S7 report. Father did not have face to face direct contact with children for majority of life of case. District Judge made Shared care as final order in respect of both parents.
West Yorkshire (2024)
Child arrangements application . Same sex couple .Issues of legal parentage raised by respondent parent. Ultimately agreed that both had legal parentage. More complex and nuanced in that multiple children of the family with different birth parents.
South East Midlands (2024)
Long running case with repeated applications.
Findings made against one parent that had alienated the child. S37 and S7 reports ordered. Other parent sought initially a change of residence. Shared care with both parents ultimately ordered by Circuit Judge in respect of the child . Costs order made against the parent who alienated the child.
Wakefield (2023)
Child Arrangement Order application by father. Representing father. Mother opposed father’s application for shared care on basis of child’s young age, her primary relationship with the child and the low level of contact agreed to date by mother. Both parents local to one another. Shared care highly workable and no welfare issues. Justices made shared care order made.
Newcastle (2023)
Enforcement/ CAO application by father. Representing mother. Father acted as a litigant in person. Resolved orders by agreement.
York (2023)
Enforcement/ Child arrangement application by father. Representing mother. Father acted as litigant in person. Resolved matters by agreement at first hearing.
Scarborough (2023)
Child arrangement application by father. Finding of fact hearing listed. Findings made against father. Father completed DAPP. Mother psychologically assessed as traumatised by father’s conduct. Mother needed very specific therapy before being able to consider or manage contact between father and child. No contact recommended including indirect. Father’s application for contact dismissed.
Multi day Fact Find Lincoln (2022)
Represented father where mother had alleged domestic abusive in terms of coercive control, excessive drinking, over chastisement of the children and rape. No findings made of the above. Ultimate outcome was that father’s unsupervised contact was restored with an order for overnights in term time and holiday contact.
Relocation Case, Middlesbrough (2021)
Multi day hearing. Representing father where Mother’s application was to relocate with children from Teesside to Home Counties. Shared care already in place for children in Teesside. Application refused on basis of ages of children, their wishes and feelings, disruption/harm caused by the proposed move and the need to maintain a close and consistent relationship with both parents. Term time contact, if the children moved, would be insufficient to maintain relationship with father and would have detrimental effect on the children. Concern that children may become resentful of frequent travel and contact arrangements to Teesside. Shared care order continued.
Clerks
Helen Williams
Call: 2000
Helen Williams
LLB Hons
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 547EL
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Helen is a specialist in both public law and private children law. Helen is known for being ‘down to earth’ and ‘pragmatic’ and is highly sought after by local solicitors.
Reputation
Helen presents seminars on behalf of the Family Team including training the local authority on various public law matters.
Expertise
Family
Public Law
Helen has a particular interest in representing respondent parents and the child. Helen has expertise in working with vulnerable adults and children.
Private Children
Helen deals with all aspects of private law children cases including those where there are significant welfare issues.
Clerks
Semaab Shaikh
Call: 2002
Semaab Shaikh
LL.B (Hons), University of Birmingham (1999)
LL.M, Comparative, European & Public Law,
University of Birmingham (2000)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 835PA
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Semaab Shaikh was called to the Bar in 2002 (Lincolns Inn) and completed her pupillage at Cloisters in London. Prior to coming to the Bar she was employed as a legal adviser and support worker for a domestic violence organisation in the North of England.
She practises in the area of Family Law. Semaab is a highly-rated barrister who since 2010 has been regularly recommended by the Legal 500 for her specialist knowledge and ability to represent clients in the most difficult situations. As an experienced family law barrister she specialises in all aspects of private and public children law; radicalisation cases; domestic abuse; removal from the jurisdiction; international child abduction, forced marriage and female genital mutilation. Semaab appears on behalf of parents, local authorities and children. She has been involved in high profile cases that have attracted local and national media interest. She has a strong interest in the area of forced marriage and cases with an international element.
In addition to her practice, Semaab provides training on children law, domestic abuse, deprivation of liberty, forced marriage, female genital mutilation, the interplay between family law and immigration law and related areas. In November 2018 she provided training on gender based violence as part of the Hong Kong Justice Centre’s annual symposium held at the University of Hong Kong.
From 2008 to 2014 Semaab was appointed to the Bar Council’s Equality and Diversity Committee. In 2018 she was invited to sit on the Advisory Board of the School of Law of the University of Bradford.
Other languages:
Urdu
Reputation
"Semaab is excellent. She is very calm under pressure despite dealing with challenging and difficult clients, she is technically excellent, and she is excellent when cross-examining." (Legal 500, 2026)
“Semaab is a highly skilled advocate: very persuasive and methodical. She is very empathic and understanding, and provides very strategic and sound advice.” (Legal 500, 2025)
“The ‘exemplary’ Semaab Shaikh has an excellent reputation for handling cases involving allegations of international child abduction, sexual abuse, forced marriage, domestic abuse and fabricated or induced illness.” (Legal 500, 2024)
“A formidable court advocate who is excellent under pressure, and demonstrates good empathy with clients.” (Legal 500, 2023)
“Semaab is simply excellent. She works incredibly hard and is always well prepared. Good with difficult clients.” (Legal 500, 2022)
“Tier 1.”(Legal 500 2021)
“Tier 1.”(Legal 500 2020)
“Tier 1.”(Legal 500 2019)
“She has particular expertise in forced marriage cases.” (Legal 500 2018)
“She fights her corner and is very good on her feet.” (Legal 500 2017)
“Demonstrates impressive knowledge of the complexities of children and domestic abuse issues.” (Legal 500 2015)
“In addition to her childcare work, she is experienced in forced marriage cases.” (Legal 500 2014)
“Has a comprehensive understanding of children law and domestic abuse matters.” (Legal 500 2013)
“Totally professional and reliable.” (Legal 500 2012)
“Approachable, very thorough – one step ahead.” (Legal 500 2010)
Expertise
Family
Semaab is a highly rated barrister and established family law practitioner. She has provided advice and representation from first instance to Court of Appeal level and has experience of making an application to the High Court for permission to “leapfrog” to the Supreme Court. She regularly represents and advises individuals, local authorities and children’s guardians in cases involving the following:
Private children disputes, including where allegations of serious domestic abuse have been raised and in relation to contact, living arrangements, education, temporary and permanent removal from the jurisdiction Public law proceedings , including care and placement order proceedings Adoption Child Abduction, Wardship and applications under the Inherent Jurisdiction Forced Marriage Female Genital Mutilation Cases with an international element Human Rights Act 1998 * Applications under the Family Law Act 1996
Children (Public Law)
In relation to public law care proceedings Semaab has been instructed in cases involving the death of a child, serious non-accidental injuries, sexual abuse (including grooming cases and inter-sibling abuse), factitious illness syndrome and parents with serious drug and alcohol addictions. She has particular experience in advising and representing parties in applications in respect of children giving evidence in family cases and is experienced in cross-examining children and vulnerable witnesses.
Cases of Interest:
Led in a case before Holman J representing a child complainant where allegations of inter-sibling sexual abuse had been made and were successfully proven
Instructed to represent a step-father facing serious allegations of sexual, physical and emotional abuse of children; requiring cross-examination of the eldest child complainant
Advised and represented a local authority in two separate cases seeking and obtaining forced marriage protection orders in respect of victims outside the jurisdiction
Represented a local authority in a case in which children were at risk of significant harm due to the risk of removal by the parents to ISIL controlled areas
Instructed in a case in which the local authority had concerns that a teenage child had been groomed by a paedophile ring and was being sexually exploited
Instructed and led in a case representing a foreign national mother and a “stranded spouse” abroad. At the conclusion of the case, successfully persuaded the local authority to assist the mother in returning to the jurisdiction enabling her to care for the children.
Children (Private Law)
Semaab has in depth knowledge of private children law cases in which domestic abuse has been raised. She has a particular interest in private children law cases with an international element. She has experience of representing vulnerable parties and parents with serious drug and alcohol addictions.
Cases of Interest:
Represented a high profile individual in the entertainment industry facing allegations of serious illicit substance misuse and at the final hearing secured extensive unsupervised contact ;
Instructed to represent a mother with limited leave to remain in the UK where her dual national child had been left in the care of his extended paternal family abroad;
Represented a mother in wardship proceedings , lengthy private law proceedings and public law proceedings. The case concerned complex and protracted proceedings with an international element and the unusual feature of two siblings each living with one parent and for a period of time having no contact with the other sibling or parent.
Notable Cases
Re M (Placement Order) EWCA Civ 214 [2025]
Represented father in complex appellate proceedings relating to international placement and its interplay with the 'nothing else will do' adoptive standard (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2025/214.html)
BMDC v P [2019]
Represented a child complainant where allegations of inter-sibling sexual abuse had been made and were proven.
BMDC v A [2018]
Instructed to represent a step-father facing serious allegations of sexual, physical and emotional abuse of children; requiring cross-examination of the eldest child complainant.
LCC v VM [2014]
Instructed in a public children law case in which the local authority had concerns that a teenage child had been groomed by a paedophile ring and was being sexually exploited.
LCC v Y [2016]; LCC v N [2016]
Advised and represented the local authority in two separate cases seeking and obtaining forced marriage protection orders in respect of victims outside the jurisdiction.
LA v A [2015]
Represented a local authority in a case in which children were at risk of significant harm due to the risk of removal by the parents to ISIL controlled areas.
BMDC v SK [2014]
Instructed and led in a case representing a foreign national mother stranded abroad and the initial plan for the children was to remain in long-term foster care. At the conclusion of the case, successfully persuaded the local authority to assist the mother in returning to the jurisdiction enabling her to care for the children.
LCC v SB [2019]
Instructed and advised in a case representing a foreign national mother abroad with children in foster care in England. The children’s father was a British national but was deceased. The local authority undertook assessments through CFAB and were persuaded to assist the mother in coming to the UK for the purposes of a further assessment.
HC (A Minor Deprivation of Liberty) [2018] EWHC 2961 (Fam)
Represented the local authority in an application for determination as to whether a placement of a 13 year old child constituted a deprivation of liberty and in the event it did for the Court to grant declaratory relief under its inherent jurisdiction.
Clerks
Kiran Dhillon
Call: 2005
Kiran Dhillon
LL.B (Hons), King’s College, London (2004)
LL.M University College, London (2006)
Neville Laski Scholarship, Inner Temple (2006)
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 217XJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kiran Dhillon previously practised in London and joined chambers in 2012. Since then, she has built up a strong practice in the following areas: Family and Civil law.
Reputation
Kiran is fluent in Punjabi.
Expertise
Family
Kiran Dhillon has established a busy practice in this field. She accepts instructions in private and public law Children Act 1989 matters and has experience in representing parents and Local Authorities in cases of considerable complexity. Kiran can be relied upon to combine frank yet sensitive advice in Children Act matters, as well as in cases where injunctive relief is sought. She is a robust advocate.
Civil
Kiran Dhillon has considerable expertise in civil litigation. Regularly instructed on fast and multi-track cases. Her practice covers both Claimant and Defendant work. Her attention to detail is consistently noted.
- Personal Injury law: cases ranging from employer’s liability and workplace injuries to road traffic accidents and infant approvals. She has been briefed in cases involving singular as well as multiple injuries and is often asked to advise on complex issues on liability and quantum. Kiran can be relied upon to produce high-quality statements of case and aims to complete paper briefs within 14 days of receipt.
- Medical Negligence: advises on prospects of success; drafts concise statements of case and aims to complete within 14 days of receipt of instructions.
- Breach of contract: examples of work- breach of restrictive covenants; payment of debt; consumer and commercial contracts. Has appeared in the Court of Appeal in a breach of contract matter.
- Costs: precedent cost budgets; advises on costs in general.
- Housing: regularly instructed in possession proceedings; acts both for tenants and landlords.
- Property: landlord and tenant disputes e.g. disrepair, possession, leases, freeholds, boundary disputes, easements etc.
Notable Cases
Represented a vulnerable young mother with mental health difficulties before the President of the Family Division, who referred to her as being “very capable”.
Represented a Local Authority in a baby shaking case, which resulted in multiple injuries, including retinal haemorrhages.
Represented a Mother accused of intentionally burning her young daughter.
Advised a Local Authority on jurisdiction- specifically on BAII not applying where there was a placement order application.
Represented a Father in prolonged private law proceedings (high level of adult conflict), which resulted in a transfer of residence in his favour.
Clerks
Emily Ward
Call: 2011 - Deputy Head of the Family Law Team
Emily Ward
LL.B (Hons) University of Manchester (2010, First Class) (six prizes)
Bar Professional Training Course (2011)
Middle Temple, Godfrey Heilpern Scholar
Deputy District Judge (2019) - Civil, Public & Private Children, and Financial Remedies
Arbitrator
Farquhar Committee Member
Transparency Implementation Group Member
Resolution FLBA
Secretary of Regional FLBA (Yorkshire & Humber)
Women in Law
International Association of Women Judges
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Emily is Deputy Head of the Family Team and has a strong, busy practice both on and off the North Eastern Circuit. She is a particularly sought after in matrimonial finance and cohabitation disputes, as well as complex children cases. Emily is consistently recognised as a leading junior in family law in the Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners. She has a keen eye for detail and quickly grasps the key issues in the case.
Emily is also a member of Broadway House Chambers’ Business, Property & Probate Team, and acts in cases where there is a cross-over in jurisdictions and issues.
Emily was appointed as a Deputy District Judge in 2019, at the age of 30, and she holds children (public and private law), civil and financial remedy tickets.
Keen on all forms of alternative dispute resolution, Emily is instructed to act for clients at round table meetings, mediations, private FDRs and early neutral evaluations, as well as arbitrations. She also acts as a Private FDR practitioner/evaluator in financial remedy, Schedule 1 and TOLATA cases, offering her assistance from an neutral perspective with the aim of assisting parties to reach a swift resolution to their disputes.
Emily frequently delivers CPD accredited seminars to groups of lawyers, and is regularly approached to conduct bespoke training in her areas of expertise. She is published in the Family Law Journal, is a case reviewer for Nagalro, Seen & Heard Journal, and has recently taken up the position of Blog Editor of the Financial Remedies Journal. Emily is a published author, being responsible for chapters in both ‘Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents’ and ‘Butterworths Family Law Service’.
Able to accept instructions under the Direct Access scheme, Emily can also provide advice and representation direct to the public.
Reputation
• Author contributor of the leading text ‘Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents’.
• Author contributor of two chapters in Butterworths Family Law Service.
• Lectures for Resolution, FLBA and the Judicial College, as well as for solicitors/lawyers.
• Blog Editor and a member of the Financial Remedies Journal Editorial Board.
• Multiple publications in Family Law Journal.
• Case reviewer for Nagalro.
Consistently recommended as a Leading Junior in the legal directories since 2017:
"Emily works hard to find the best solution for each client. She is a fantastic advocate and is able to put across her client's case with ease and common sense. She has an ability that is massively ahead of her call. She is outstanding and gives everything to a case"(Chambers and Partners - Band 1 Finance and Band 1 Children, 2026)
'Emily is simply brilliant with a fantastic understanding of the law and how it should be implemented. She displays a tremendous empathy to clients and can easily stand her ground against the most experienced of barristers. Emily is a tactical advocate, never one to shy away from a fight. She is a really impressive barrister who is quick on her feet when put on the spot.” (Legal 500, 2026)
"Emily builds a great rapport with clients and is a determined advocate.Emily is a fantastic advocate and she has a great way with clients. She is calm, collected and sensible. She is focused on finding the best outcome for clients, with a sensible approach. She's very technical, good on her feet, and judges like her." (Chambers and Partners - Band 1 Finance and Band 2 Children, 2025)
'Emily is a very high quality junior: sensible, intelligent and respected, she fights hard when needed. The family law world is her oyster.Emily Ward‘s ’eye for detail is phenomenal. Emily is an excellent communicator, who quickly makes clients feel at ease. She is well prepared, fights hard when she needs to, and knows how to land the killer blow in her papers and cross-examination. Emily Ward is ’a high quality junior on financial cases‘, and is often instructed in cases involving complex trust structures, pre-acquired wealth and pre- and post-nuptial agreements.” (Legal 500, 2025)
Emily Ward is a high-quality junior who covers a broad range of topics across family law. She is respected for her work on highly complex financial remedies, often involving various asset types and acting for high net worth individuals. She is further experienced in handling sensitive children cases including relocations, in which she acts on behalf of children and parents alike (Chambers and Partners - Band 1 Finance and Band 2 Children, 2024)
‘Emily is phenomenally bright and personable - a combination that puts clients at ease from the outset. Her cross examination is first rate, and she will fight tooth and nail for the client to achieve the right outcome.' (2023)
‘Emily Ward is a high-quality junior who covers a broad range of topics across family law. She is respected for her work on highly complex financial remedies, often involving various asset types and acting for high net worth individuals. She is further experienced in handling sensitive children cases including relocations, in which she acts on behalf of children and parents alike. Emily Ward is a high-quality junior who covers a broad range of topics across family law. She is respected for her work on highly complex financial remedies, often involving various asset types and acting for high net worth individuals. She is further experienced in handling sensitive children cases including relocations, in which she acts on behalf of children and parents alike. Emily combines a great legal brain with her feet firmly on the ground. She has a good manner with clients, who appreciate her pragmatic approach, as well as sound legal advice.' (2023)
‘A high quality junior.’ ‘She is a highly skilled advocate, knowledgeable, and clients like her down-to-earth manner and caring approach.’ ‘Emily is an outstanding advocate who is also fantastic with clients. She always goes the extra mile and works very hard on her written work.’ (2022)
‘A very talented junior, with an extremely bright future. She is a calm and measured advocate, who presents her clients' cases in a strong and persuasive manner. ’ (2022)
‘She punches well above her weight and is not afraid to tackle very complex cases and holds her own against senior opponents. Good knowledge of the law, very down to earth with clients, easy to contact with instructions provides excellent feedback on how a case has progressed or settled in court proceedings. Strong advocate.’ (2021)
‘She's superb - she's got a brain the size of Britain! She has worked on some complex cases where the chances of winning would be slim but pulled off some good results.’ ‘She is very down to earth and can put a client at ease within minutes. She's good at delivering difficult advice clearly.’ ‘She's just an all-round great performer and wise beyond her years.’ (2021)
‘She holds her own against far more senior opponents.’ (2020)
‘A rising star whose expertise spans a range of family law matters, with a focus on matrimonial finance and child-related cases. She represents parents and local authorities in various care proceedings which often involve complex medical evidence.’ ‘She is an exceptional advocate with a great eye for detail who consistently impresses with her representation in both financial and children proceedings.’ ‘She offers great client care and is fearless.’ (2020)
Expertise
Financial Remedy & Schedule 1
Emily is an established matrimonial finance specialist and is highly sought after in financial remedy and schedule 1 cases. She acts for clients from pre-issue, where focus is primarily upon strategy, settlement and advice as to evidence, through to final hearings and on appeal. Her case load comprises high net worth clients with large incomes and substantial capital, business, trust assets and/or extensive pension provision, as well as difficult cases where needs exceed the available assets.
Emily is experienced in advising in cases where the issues include pre-acquired wealth, inheritance, complex business and trust structures, liquidity issues and nuptial agreements. She is also often approached to advise in cases where there have been substantial personal injury awards. Her recent and current cases include:
• Advising in relation to a substantial discretionary family trust, created after a lottery win (+£9m).
• Representation of a party with significant company assets, including a limited company valuation of £5.9m.
• Securing findings of undisclosed assets and foreign income in China. Complex issues concerning jurisdiction and enforcement.
• Advising and drafting pre-nuptial agreement in a high value case with assets in the UK, Russia, Germany, Austria and Iran.
• Currently instructed in a case where assets exceed £12m.
Private Children
In addition, Emily’s family practice encompasses all areas Private Children Law. She advises and represents clients in a wide range of applications, and she is a favourite in cases involving intractable contact disputes, implacable hostility and vulnerable individuals. She is frequently praised for her sensitive yet sensible approach with clients. Recognised for her sensitive approach, Emily has dealt with a significant number of cases in which there has been a parent death or terminal diagnosis of a parent.
Emily also represents clients in cases involving domestic abuse, including coercive and controlling behaviour allegations and also cases where false allegations of abuse against parents and/or children have been made.
Her latest children cases include:
• Representation of a parent at a finding of fact hearing concerning multiple serious allegations of physical, psychological, emotional and sexual abuse against the resident parent and the children, including multiple rape and GBH.
• Representing two professional people at multi-day fact findings hearings in which allegations of coercive and controlling behaviour were found proved.
• Acting for a parent in a case where false allegations of sexual abuse were made against him, and found after trial to have been fabricated by the other parent.
• Acting for grandparents in a case where their son had been killed, contact with grandchildren stopped by the other parent and allegations of sexual abuse made against one of the grandparents. Findings of fabrication were made and contact was reinstated.
Civil
Emily’s civil law practice incorporates a range of matters, including land and trust disputes (to which she brings extensive legal knowledge from her authorship and editorship in leading practitioner cohabitation texts), Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 claims, and bankruptcy and insolvency in a family law context.
Given her family law practice, Emily has particular specialism in civil and chancery matters with a family element, including advising in professional negligence issues stemming from family law proceedings/advice and land and trust disputes in a family setting.
Emily’s recent cases include:
• Acting for a client resisting an application to annul his bankruptcy petition. Linked financial remedy proceedings.
• Representing an intervener in civil proceedings (the family proceedings having been stayed pending the outcome of the civil dispute) concerning various property transactions and arguments as to beneficial interests in property.
• Currently instructed in two cross-over cases where issues of financial remedy and probate collide.
• Currently instructed in five farming cases, which include partnership disputes and third party property rights.
Notable Cases
Re W [2016] EWCA Civ 793 (July 2016) – Representation of grandparents on pro-bono basis unled against three silks. Important and leading case in relation to adoption.
Re W (Adoption – Contact) [2016] EWHC 3118 (Fam) – Re-hearing of Re W (below). Appeared against a silk unled.
Re W [2016] EWHC 2437 (Fam) - First instance contested adoption case.
IC v RC [2020] EWHC 2997 (Fam) – Important case in relation to the slip rule and legal principles associated thereto.
SH (A Child) [2020] EWHC 1510 (Fam)
O v O (2020): Finding of fact hearing in private children proceedings where Emily’s client was accused of sexually abusing his step-daughter over a prolonged period of time. Careful consideration and handling of the child witness was required taking account of advocates toolkits and special measures.
W v W (2021): Representation of the respondent in high value and complex financial remedy proceedings in a civil partnership dispute. Significant issues in the case included the respondent’s: (i) substantial pre-acquired assets; (ii) the respondent’s interest in a by-pass trust (c.£1M); (iii) significant inherited assets; (iv) shareholding in a company with a value of £16.6M; and, (v) interest in a newly incorporated company. Expert evidence was required, including in relation to the impact of Covid-19 and extraction of funds for the settlement. The added complication in this case was the short length of the marriage, but also the applicant’s health needs and the potential for ongoing spousal maintenance payable by the respondent. Case settled on a clean break basis, which excluded the majority of the pre-acquired assets.
F v M (2021): Representation of a father contested jurisdiction proceedings in the High Court. The final hearing, which ran over four days, involved complex issues of fact, with multiple witnesses giving evidence from different countries, and complex issues of law (including Qatari law) were considered.
Clerks
Kerry Barker
Call: 2013 (Solicitor 2003)
Kerry Barker
B.A. (Hons), Law & Business (1998)
Admitted as a Solicitor (2003)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02CXW
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kerry Barker is a barrister who specialises in Family Law. Having previously qualified as a solicitor in 2003, Kerry practices exclusively in this area and represents clients in private law and public law matters. As a solicitor Kerry was a member of the Law Society’s Children Panel and also held her higher court advocacy rights; recognising her position as an experienced solicitor-advocate.
Since Kerry joined Broadway House Chambers’ highly-rated Family Law Team in March 2013 she has developed a busy practice exclusively in family law. As a family law specialist for over 15 years Kerry has built up extensive knowledge in all areas of family law.
Kerry is well known for providing clients with realistic and sensible advice at all stages of proceedings and for conducting hearings in a measured manner. Kerry’s friendly and approachable manner make her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
“You are a star Kerry. Your thoroughness and attention to detail is appreciated.”
(Bradford Solicitor)
Kerry has considerable experience of cases involving different cultures, which often require an interpreter.
Kerry is able to accept instructions under the Direct Access Scheme.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Public Law
Kerry acts for clients in difficult and complex cases involving non-accidental injuries, sexual abuse, domestic violence and mental health aspects, and is known for her high competence and thoroughness as an advocate in very sensitive matters at every level in the unified family jurisdiction. Kerry is also instructed by Local Authorities at all levels of public law proceedings.
Kerry Barker has a very busy public law practice which is characterised by representing parties in very complex cases where in most cases expert evidence has been relied upon. Recent cases include significant and chronic neglect, multiple fractures and bruises, and psychological/psychiatric evidence. Kerry has represented Local Authorities and parents in lengthy (10 day plus) finding of fact and final hearings.
Kerry conducts cases involving applications for care and supervision orders; contact with children in care; discharge proceedings; placement and adoption orders; and special guardianship orders. In these proceedings Kerry represents parents, grandparents, children and other interested parties in complex care proceedings. As a solicitor she was also a member of the Children Panel and, accordingly, her experience in representing children is considerable.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority supported by the Children’s Guardian sought Care and Placement Order. The final hearing included cross examination of expert witnesses where the issues related to the mother’s alcohol use. Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority and the court made an order allowing the child to return to the care of the mother under a Child Arrangements Order.
- At a three day interim care hearing Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority to remove two children from the care of parents due to issues of chronic neglect. In this hearing Kerry represented the father. The children remained in the care of the parents subject to an interim care order pending further assessments.
- Representation of young mother with learning disabilities in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority were applying for Care and Placement orders. The final hearing took place over 8 days and included lengthy cross examination of expert witnesses.
- Representation of Local Authority at Final hearing which was heard over eight days. The Children’s Guardian did not support the plans of the Local Authority. Kerry was successful in persuading the court to approve the Local Authority plans.
- Cases involving adoption where applications for leave to revoke a Placement Order and leave to oppose an Adoption Order have been made.
Private Law
Kerry Barker also represents parties in private law cases, including those where there are significant welfare issues. She is regularly instructed in residence, contact, prohibited steps, specific issue order applications and leave to remove from the jurisdiction (both internal and external) and is able to provide advice on discrete matters of law and evidence.
Kerry’s private law practice is dominated by complex cases including issues such as long-standing domestic abuse, allegations of rape and sexual abuse, allegations of violence to children, and removal from the jurisdiction. Kerry is a favorite amongst solicitors for her delicate approach to such sensitive matters.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in private law proceedings in the High Court. The issues before the court related to competing jurisdictional arguments between UK and Greece.
- Representation of the child within private law proceedings where the issue before the court was one of Jurisdiction. It was being argued that the proceedings ought to be stayed and proceedings transferred to Scotland. Kerry successfully argued that the UK has jurisdiction.
- Representation of father within private law proceedings where the mother had applied to remove the child from the jurisdiction to Pakistan. Kerry was successful in opposing the mother’s application.
- Representation of client within proceedings where the mother sought to relocate over 200 miles within the UK. Kerry successfully opposed the mother’s application on behalf of the father.
- Kerry has dealt with a number of cases involving same-sex relationships and is well versed in case law relating to the area.
Domestic Violence
Kerry is regularly instructed to represent parties before the court in connection with applications under the Family Law Act 1996. Additionally, Kerry also represents parties in applications arising under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997. In this area, Kerry represents both applicants and respondents in cases which involve very serious harm. Kerry’s approachability and friendly nature makes her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
Notable Cases
AB v Durham County Council [2024] EWFC 15
High Court - In November 2024, Kerry Barker represented the Local Authority in the case of AB v Durham County Council. AB (father) made an application to revoke the placement order that was issued in 2023.The application was refused as it was found that the children's best interests lie with the prospective adopters.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/370.html.
A Metropolitan District Council v M & Ors [2019] EWFC 15
Kerry was Junior Counsel, Led by Gillian Irving QC instructed to represent the Applicant Local Authority in which the Local Authority sought care orders in relation to 6 children. The case involved serious allegations of sexual abuse; expert evidence and was heard over 10 days.
C (A Child: Serious Physical Injuries fact finding ) [2018] EWFC 13
Kerry represented the mother at the fact finding hearing which was heard over eight days before Holman J. The issue before the court was who had caused very significant injuries to the child who was just 5 weeks old at the time she sustained her injuries. The mother was exonerated from causing the injuries.
Re W ( A Child) [2017] EWFC B42
Representation of the Children’s Guardian on an application made by the Local Authority for Leave to Appeal. In this case, Kerry appeared against Leading Counsel.
Re B ( A Child: Guardianship Order) [2017] EWFC B39
Representation of the mother in Public Law Proceedings where the court was faced with the decision as to whether to make a Special Guardianship Order or Care Order.
Re P ( A Child) [2016] EWFC B42
Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority sought final Care and Placement Orders.
Clerks
Christopher Rowe
Call: 2014
Christopher Rowe
M Law Exempting (BPTC), Northumbria University (First Class)
Bar Professional Training Course (Outstanding)
Lawyers Without Borders Intern 2014
Woon Foundation Scholarship (2011)
Honour Roll, Northumbria University School of Law (2012, 2013, 2014)
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Christopher is a member of Broadway House Chambers Family Team and Business, Property & Probate Team. He specialises in:
• Financial Remedy
• Private Law Children
• Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA).
Reputation
‘Christopher has an extremely natural and friendly manner with clients, and he provides sensible and reasoned arguments in court.' (Band 2, Legal 500, 2026)
‘Christopher has a very calming influence on clients and opponents alike. He is exceptionally well-prepared and his advocacy style is concise, which is always welcomed by the judiciary.’ (Band 2, Legal 500, 2025)
Christopher is committed to access to justice. He was shortlisted for Young Pro Bono Barrister of the Year at Advocate’s Pro Bono Awards in 2021 having completed 100 hours of Pro Bono work for Advocate in 12 months. Christopher undertook a further 25 hours to celebrate Advocate’s 25th anniversary and continues to work with Advocate.
Expertise
Family
Financial Remedy Proceedings
Christopher is a financial remedy specialist. His practice includes cases where:
• pre and post-nuptial agreements feature, including challenges to those agreements;
• properties and other assets, including pensions, are located abroad;
• businesses and partnerships are a central part of the proceedings;
• complex pensions issues arise; and
• where assets are dissipated and injunction applications are issued.
Christopher is dedicated to bringing a calm and measured approach to each case and prides himself on his ability to work collaboratively with professional clients. He focuses on providing clear and practical advice to clients, cutting to the core of the issues in a case to find a solution wherever possible.
Christopher’s dual financial remedy and TOLATA practice means that he is well placed to advise and represent clients in financial remedy proceedings where trust/property ownership issues are a key feature.
He is equally comfortable advising in conference (in person or remotely) or in writing and is able to travel.
Private Law Children
Christopher’s private law children practice sees him regularly instructed in complex and entrenched proceedings. He represents clients in cases involving:
• Proposed relocation of children both abroad and within the UK;
• Allegations of domestic abuse, both at fact finding and welfare hearings; and
• Where a Children’s Guardian is appointed.
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustee Act 1996
Christopher’s TOLATA practice includes both cohabitation cases and where properties are owned for investment purposes. He regularly speaks at conferences/webinars on TOLATA matters throughout the year.
Christopher’s practical and concise approach to cases assists clients in finding a workable solution to prospective litigation. Christopher places great emphasis on working as a team with professional clients, from the outset, to prepare a case and if possible explore settlement options.
His practice includes drafting pleadings, advising in person and in writing (both pre and post action), and representing clients at case management conferences, other hearings and trials.
Clerks
Ned Sproston
Call: 2014
Ned Sproston
MPhys (Master of Physics)
PGCE (Secondary Education)
GDL (Distinction)
BPTC (Very Competent)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FEJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Ned is a Family and Civil practitioner, predominantly practising in the field of Private Children. He receives a significant volume of instructions in contested hearings such as Finding of Fact Hearings and Final Hearings. In addition to this, Ned’s practice also covers Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act cases and, TOLATA. In the civil sphere, Ned takes on Road Traffic Accident cases and other Personal Injury claims. Ned does not generally practice in Public Children cases but will remain with a client under circumstances where a Private case enters the Public Law arena part way through..
Ned is a qualified civil and commercial mediator and is available for instruction in that capacity. Please enquire about this with our clerks if this is a service you might consider.
Reputation
“Never one to shy away from knotty issues, Ned’s forensic and calm approach to complex private law cases is reassuring to clients and practitioners alike. He is always approachable and on-hand to discuss any issue of the case no matter how small. A pleasure to work with" (Partner at Local Firm)
Expertise
Family
Private Children - Over 80% of Ned’s workload covers Private Children matters covering the spectrum of issues. Ned has a reputation as an advocate who is able to quickly get to grips with a trial bundle and separate “the wheat from the chaff”. As a former secondary school teacher, Ned is experienced working with young and/or vulnerable people and is good at helping lay clients consider (and hopefully accept) what can sometimes be difficult truths, in a sensitive manner.
Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act, and TOLATA – A significant minority of Ned’s workload covers these areas of the law and he is happy to accept appropriate instruction accordingly. Ned is very ethically minded and aware of the importance of trying to reach a fair settlement at an early stage if possible.
Civil
Personal Injury – Ned regularly accepts instructions in this area and has found that his background in Physics sometimes comes in handy when trying to analyse and argue the mechanics of a road traffic collision when causation is in dispute.
Ancillary Relief, Schedule 1 Children Act, and TOLATA – A significant minority of Ned’s workload covers these areas of the law and he is happy to accept appropriate instruction accordingly. Ned is very ethically minded and aware of the importance of trying to reach a fair settlement at an early stage if possible.
Clerks
Harry Wiltshire
Call: 2015
Harry Wiltshire
Bath University, BA Hons Business Administration
GDL and BPTC, BPP Leeds
Middle Temple, Harmsworth Scholar
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02GCI
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Harry is experienced in representing both Claimants and Respondents in the employment tribunal, he regularly appears in cases dealing with unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions, discrimination, whistle blowing and employment status.
Harry accepts instructions in private law children matters. He regularly deals with contested final hearings and multi day finding of fact hearings, including issues such as domestic violence and relocation.
Harry is developing a growing matrimonial finance practice, he is regularly instructed to undertake Financial Dispute Resolution Appointments and Final Hearings.
Harry is registered with the Bar Council to undertake direct access work.
Harry is a member of Broadway House Chambers Business, Property and Probate Team. Prior to Pupillage Harry ran his own business, he has a strong understanding of the pressures involved in the management of a SME and is comfortable dealing with commercial disputes.
Prior to pupillage Harry competed as a professional athlete. Harry is Deputy Head of Sports, Media and Entertainment Team. He has gained experience of contractual disputes and disciplinary proceedings in the sporting arena. He has also been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Reputation
Expertise
Employment
Harry regularly represents both Claimants and Respondents in the Employment Tribunal. He accepts instructions to advise, undertake drafting and attend hearings. Harry deals with a wide range of issues, including: employment status, unfair dismissal, discrimination (including disability and sex), whistleblowing detriment and holiday pay.
Sport
Prior to pupillage Harry spent 15 years competing as a professional athlete regularly representing Great Britain at international level. Harry’s experience as an athlete gives him a huge advantage when approaching sport cases and makes him a very appealing choice for lay clients in the sports arena.
Harry has experience of sports contract disputes and disciplinary proceedings. He has been involved in the representation of athletes in anti-doping and disciplinary proceedings before governing bodies, Sports Resolution UK and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Harry is on the panel of regional Rugby Football Union prosecutors.
Harry works closely with Adam Willoughby, Head of the Sports Law Team. Harry has assisted him in dealing with contractual matters on behalf of Rugby Football League Teams and the preparation of anti-doping cases on behalf of athletes who have returned adverse analytical findings.
Harry’s Sports Law practice is complimented by his special interest in employment and contractual law.
Family Law
Harry practices in private children law and financial remedy.
Notable Cases
Mr AY Ali v Salix Homes and Michael Page International Recruitment Limited Case No. 2404266/2018
Successfully represented a recruitment agency over a four day hearing securing a finding that they could not have dismissed an agency worker on the grounds of a protected disclosure, when they had no knowledge of the disclosure at the time of dismissal. The case also raised a breach of contract, direct discrimination and worker/ employee status.
Mrs C Tantrum -v- Ashville College and others 180078/2018
Successfully argued at a three day hearing that the Claimant was an employee rather than a self employed sports teacher working at a private school. The finding meant that the matter settled following a judicial mediation. The case raised issues of protected disclosures, an unfair dismissal, holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages
Smith -v- Bradford District Care NHS
Representing the Claimant at a three day hearing dealing with claims of indirect discrimination on the grounds of disability, as well as harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Mr J Bassey -v- HMRC
Junior Counsel representing the respondent at a three week tribunal dealing with 88 allegations of harassment and racial discrimination.
Ms KJ Badon -v- The Secretary of Health & Social Care
Junior Counsel representing the Respondent at a two week hearing, where the Claimant alleged she was subjected to a detriment to deter, punish or prevent trade union activity.
Mr A Poznaski -v- Exceed Logistics Limited 2600570/2018
Represented the Claimant who asserted that he had been unfairly dismissed following an allegation of fuel theft. Secured a finding for the Claimant in relation to an unlawful deduction from wages.
Daniel Alden -v- Skinnergate Cycles Stockton Limited 2501655/2018
Successfully represented the Respondent securing the dismissal of the claim as out of time and through failure to comply with Court Orders. Disability also considered.
Clerks
Anna Sutcliffe
Call - 2015
Anna Sutcliffe
BPP University; BPTC; Outstanding
University of Cambridge, Fitzwilliam College, BA (Hons) Law; 2.1
Qualified Family Mediator
Family Law Bar Association
Resolution
Honourable Society of Middle Temple (Astbury Scholarship – 2014)
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Anna is a specialist family law barrister who has maintained a deliberately mixed practice encompassing matrimonial finance and both private and public law children work. This enables her to advise clients on all aspects of their family law case, particularly where different areas of family law overlap. Anna spent the first 9 years of her practice at a leading family law set in London and she has experience appearing at all levels up to and including representing clients in the High Court. She is equally happy appearing in her own right or being led as junior counsel.
Anna also conducts private FDR hearings (with experience as both counsel and pFDR “judge”), and is a qualified mediator for both children and finance matters.
Reputation
Tier 2 (Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners 2026)
“Unfailingly well prepared and excellent with clients” – Chambers & Partners 2025
“Anna is efficient and approachable to work with. She provides highly technical advice and great client care” – Chambers & Partners 2025
“Anna takes difficult cases in her stride and is always calm, reassuring and to the point – judges love her.” – Chambers & Partners 2024
“Anna is a tremendous fighter. She is compassionate with vulnerable clients” – Legal 500, 2025
“Anna is a confident advocate who combines excellent knowledge of the law with a compelling style. She knows when to fight and when to negotiate and is incredibly calm under pressure.” – Legal 500, 2025
Family Law Awards: Shortlisted for Young Barrister of the Year (2019)
Expertise
Children Act
Anna regularly acts in applications for Child Arrangements Orders, Prohibited Steps Order and Specific Issue Orders (including disputes over issues such as schooling, holidays and name changes). She has a particular interest in domestic and international relocation proceedings. Anna conducts multi-day fact-finding hearings within Children Act proceedings, often involving serious allegations of abuse, and has acted in a number of cases involving the appointment of a Children’s Guardian. She regularly represents vulnerable clients.
Care
Anna acts in public law children proceedings on behalf of Local Authorities, parents, guardians and extended family members and has experience representing vulnerable clients (including those assisted by an intermediary).
Finance
Anna acts in all aspects of family finance proceedings, including financial remedies and Schedule 1 of the Children Act. She has experience dealing with cases involving high-net-worth individuals, third party interventions, pre/post nuptial agreements, and jurisdictional disputes. Anna also acts and advises in enforcement and variation proceedings.
Private FDR
Anna is available to conduct private FDRs.
Mediation
Anna is qualified to mediate in both financial and children disputes.
Notable Cases
H v W (2025): Jurisdiction dispute in respect of financial remedy proceedings, with parallel proceedings currently ongoing in competing jurisdictions.
M v F (2025): Anna acts for a mother in private law proceedings with the appointment of a r.16.4 Guardian. Serious allegations of abuse and intractable opposition to contact.
H v W (2023): Junior counsel in HNW financial remedy proceedings heard in the High Court. Instructed by the Official Solicitor. Achieved favourable FDR indication leading to settlement.
H v W (2023): Representing a wife/mother in parallel children and finance proceedings, which culminated in a combined arbitration of both issues. Oral evidence required from both parents and an ISW. Outcome obtained in favour of Anna’s client on both issues, alongside a costs order.
H v W (2023): Application for a freezing injunction over c£2.5m from sale of foreign shares
M v F (2023): Anna acted for a father throughout high-conflict private law proceedings involving serious allegations of abuse. No findings were made against the father and the mother’s application to relocate with the children was successfully resisted. Findings were made in respect of the mother’s influence over the children and a shared care arrangement was implemented.
M v F (2023): Anna acted for a father throughout long running and highly acrimonious proceedings which involved, at various stages, applications by the mother to relocate overseas and internally withing the UK both of which were successfully resisted, with a shared care arrangement being implemented instead as sought by Anna’s client. The case involved particular sensitivities arising out of differing level of religious adherence between households.
Clerks
Paul Dormand
Call: 2013
Paul Dormand
BPP Manchester – GDL
Manchester Metropolitan University – BPTC
BPP Cohen Scholar
Middle Temple Harmsworth Scholar
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Paul Dormand is a member of the Family Law Team at Broadway House Chambers.
“I am using Paul on a tricky Private Law Children matter and I am very impressed with his teamwork approach. We are a small practice and it is very good to have Counsel who engage with their instructing solicitor throughout the life of the case” – Solicitor
"Paul Dormand is excellent at what he does and also an amazing person. He is very thorough, understanding, honest, trustworthy and his ability to relate to and empathise with others is remarkable. I highly recommend Paul for he is an excellent barrister and truly a genuine person. Paul has been so patient with me in this difficult time. He took the time to hear all of my concerns and clearly, concisely outlined all the different courses of action including the positives and negatives with each choice. Working with Paul was incredibly easy. He listened attentively and made me feel at ease. I could not have asked for better representation. Thank you" Client Feedback
Before coming to the Bar, Paul worked as a professional musician and teacher, performing with orchestras and ensembles all over the world.
Reputation
“*I am using Paul on a tricky Private Law Children matter and I am very impressed with his teamwork approach. We are a small practice and it is very good to have Counsel who engage with their instructing solicitor throughout the life of the case*” – Solicitor
Paul regularly presents webinar on behalf of Chambers’ Family and Employment Law Team.
Expertise
Family
Paul accepts instructions in all areas of family law, including children and finance work. Paul also accepts instructions in Court of Protection and Forced Marriage cases.
Private Children: Paul is regularly instructed to represent in private children matters, including contested applications and complex, multi day findings of fact and final hearings, often involving extremely vulnerable clients and litigants in person.
Public: Paul is instructed by Local Authorities, parents, and children in care proceedings at District and Circuit level, including case management, contested interim, and final hearings.
Financial Remedy: Paul also accepts instructions for applicants and respondents at all stages of financial remedy proceedings and is available to advise in writing or conference.
Clerks
Jenna Chaplin
Call: 2015
Jenna Chaplin
University of Sheffield, LLB Hons 2:1
University of Law, BPTC Very Competent
Middle Temple
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Jenna specialises in Private Children cases and Financial Remedy. Jenna is known for her sensitive client care, her tactful negotiation skills and her robust approach in court. Jenna prides herself on her hard-working nature, thorough preparation and attention to detail.
Jenna has a busy private children practice and has a strong track record for achieving excellent results for parents and wider family members. Jenna is regularly instructed to represent clients in complex private children cases involving serious allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation. Jenna appears in disputes regarding domestic and international relocation.
Jenna has a broad range of experience representing both Applicants and Respondents at all stages of financial remedy proceedings including final hearings. Jenna has experience in dealing with cases involving intervenors, wanton dissipation and hidden assets. Jenna is happy to advise in conference and in writing.
Jenna also accepts instructions in regulatory law, having previous experience whilst on secondment with a solicitors firm and subsequently in chambers.
Jenna joined chambers following successful completion of her pupillage under the supervision of Peter Hampton and Matthew Rudd. Prior to completing her pupillage, Jenna worked at a prestigious law firm in London.
Reputation
Jenna has conducted seminars for chambers including recently with Dornier Whittaker on alcohol testing and section 91(14) orders and Semaab Shaikh on guidance for remote hearings.
Expertise
Family
Jenna is a specialist family practitioner, undertaking cases involving private disputes regarding children and financial remedy.Jenna regularly appears in front of both District and Circuit Judges alike.
Jenna’s caseload routinely involves the following areas of private children:
• Applications for shared care/live with orders
• Applications for relocation of the children both domestically and internationally
• Applications for orders preventing the removal of a child from the jurisdiction
• Finding of Fact Hearings involving allegations of child abuse, domestic violence and parental alienation
• Applications for orders determining the child’s schooling
Jenna is regularly instructed at all stages of financial remedy proceedings.
Regulatory
Jenna accepts instructions in regulatory law. Jenna has represented Social Work England at both interim and substantive hearings whilst on secondment with a local solicitor’s firm and subsequently in chambers. Jenna has experience in drafting documents for the Panel’s consideration and advising on the merits of complex cases.
Notable Cases
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/221.html
H v W (2024): Jenna represented the Wife at a Final Hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The Court was persuaded to transfer the family home to the Wife’s name for a payment to the Husband of just £5,000 – with the Wife retaining the entirety of her NHS pension.
R v E (2024): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother in proceedings concerning international relocation. Findings were made against the Father involving physical assaults, threatening behaviour including with weapons and controlling and coercive behaviour. These findings led to the Father not actively opposing the Mother’s proposed move abroad, which had been endorsed by Cafcass.
N v H (2024): Jenna is instructed to represent the Father in ongoing proceedings relating to his 1 year old son. Serious allegations of sexual violence throughout the relationship were made against the Father in addition to controlling and coercive behaviour. All of the findings sought against the Father were dismissed.
W v H (2023): Jenna was instructed to represent the Mother at a FHDRA. Jenna successfully opposed an application for psychiatric assessment of the Mother, who had been seeing the child on a supervised basis. Jenna successfully applied for unsupervised contact. The proceedings concluded at this hearing with equal shared care.
B v H (2023): Jenna represented the Mother at a Finding of Fact hearing. The Court made multiple findings of rape, after the Father accepted that he had lied on key issues during cross-examination. Jenna made submissions that in light of the facts of the case, the principles in Re H-N & Others [2021] EWCA Civ 448 applied and invited the Court to make a finding that the Father’s rape of the Mother amounted to controlling and coercive behaviour. The Court agreed and made this finding.
N v P (2022): Jenna represented the Father at a 3 day Finding of Fact hearing. Allegations were made against the Father of rape, controlling and coercive behaviour and threatening behaviour in the presence of the child. Further allegations were made that during the course of proceedings the Father had been violent towards the child and had engaged in threatening behaviour towards the child. All findings against the Father of abusive behaviour were dismissed.
S v B (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing in a case where the child lived with his paternal aunt. The Social Worker did not recommend progressing contact. The mother sought for contact to be progressed to include overnight stays. After cross-examination of the Social Worker, the Judge indicated that she would order overnight stays, due to the responses provided by the Social Worker. The parties agreed a stepped order to include overnight stays.
P v S (2021): Jenna represented a mother at a Final Hearing, having represented the mother for over 2 years during lengthy court proceedings. The Social Worker had initially recommended overnight stays for the mother. By the time of the Final Hearing, the recommendation for overnight contact had been revoked due to a change in social worker. Furthermore, in evidence at the Final Hearing the Social Worker said that she was no longer opposing an SGO for maternal grandparents. After contested evidence, the Magistrates concluded that overnight contact was in the child’s best interests and implemented alternative weekend overnight contact in addition to extended periods of school holiday contact. The Magistrates refused to grant the application for a SGO.
Clerks
Fen Greatley-Hirsch
Call: 2018
Fen Greatley-Hirsch
LLM Legal Practice (Barristers) – BPP Law School
Adv. LLM Public International Law – Leiden University
LLB Law with French Law – University of Warwick
ADM-ODR International Qualified Civil Commercial Mediator
Baron Dr ver Heyden de Lancey Prize (Middle Temple)
The Queen Mother Scholarship (Middle Temple)
White Rose (WRoCAH) Doctoral Scholarship (Arts and Humanities Research Council)
Grade 3 Prosecutor
Contact
T: 0113 246 2600
Fen joined Chambers in December 2020 after completing a common law pupillage under the supervision of Giles Bridge and Paul Smith.
He accepts instructions in family and criminal cases and is available for consultation in conference or written advice.
Fen’s practice is shaped by his experiences in academia and working in client-facing roles with a several national and international charitable organisations, including Citizens Advice Bureau, the Free Representation Unit, and Nightline.
This work put him in regular contact with individuals from all walks of life and particularly vulnerable populations, young people, persons with disabilities and mental health conditions, and non-native English speakers. As a result, Fen understands and responds to a wide range of client needs. He approaches all matters with the utmost commitment to client care and is often praised for taking the time to ensure clients’ questions and concerns are addressed and that they feel fully represented.
Fen’s academic research focuses on issues of mental and legal capacity in criminal law using vulnerability theory. He has served on the editorial board of academic journals, worked as a research assistant for an NGO conducting strategic human rights litigation, and delivered papers at academic conferences around the world. As such, he is is able to build and present complex information and arguments in a clear and accessible way.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Fen accepts instructions in private and public Children Act proceedings at all stages, from first hearings to final hearings. A well-rounded practice sees him represent parents, Local Authorities and intervenors alike.
He has a real strength in client care and is often commended for ensuring his clients fully understand the developments in and prospects of their case and leave hearings feeling heard and fully represented.
Fen has gained particular expertise in contested and fact-finding hearings, assisted by a keen eye for detail and a forensic approach honed through criminal practice.
He regularly deals with cases involving allegations of a very serious nature – such as domestic violence, non-accidental injuries, and sexual harm – and does so with sensitivity and tact.
Fen has considerable experience representing vulnerable clients, including young persons, persons with disabilities, those with mental health issues, and those who do not speak English. He welcomes instructions in cases involving non-traditional families and those with international or intercultural elements.
Crime
Fen both prosecutes and defends at all stages – pre-trial, trial, sentence, and appeal.
He regularly appears in courts across the North Eastern and Northern Circuits in relation to the following types of offences:
- Assaults (up to and including s18);
- Road traffic;
- Public order (affrays);
- Dishonesty (handling stolen goods; burglary; robbery);
- Drugs offences (possession with intent to supply; production);
- Sexual offences (sexual assault; indecent images)
Fen is a member of the CPS General Crime Panel at Grade 3.
For the last couple of years he has been building his Crown Court trial practice and welcomes defence instructions.
He has completed the vulnerable witness training and, particularly given his experience dealing with similar matters in the family courts, is well-equipped to defend in rape, sexual assault and other such sensitive matters.
More generally, Fen’s background in academia has equipped him with the ability to quickly process and familiarise himself with large volumes of documents, as well as to make complex information accessible to a lay audience. It has also given him the research skills to locate useful case law that sometimes makes all the difference.
He has been praised by solicitors, benches and clients themselves for his skilled and sensitive witness handling and an ability to resonate with juries.
Fen builds rapports with clients easily, which quickly allows him to elicit the information needed both to build the strongest case and to address the opposing one effectively.
He has a keen eye for detail and in evidential hearings is particularly adept at witness handling, cross-examining with a forensic approach honed through criminal practice.
Fen has considerable experience representing vulnerable clients, including young persons, persons with disabilities, those with mental health issues, and those who do not speak English.
Notable Cases
R v X - Leeds Crown Court (Defence 2025)
Fen Greatley-Hirsch secured acquittal. Client at trial charged with multiple counts of voyeurism (s67 Sexual Offences Act 2003) over a 3-year period. Significant issues relating to the admissibility of several key aspects of the Crown’s case - including a video recorded interview and forensic downloads – in the context of adherence to ABE guidance, chain of custody, and principles of character evidence.
R v H - Bradford Crown Court (Defence 2024)
Fen and Nicola Hoskins secured a suspended sentence for father and son clients who were charged with intent to pervert the course of justice.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/24427369.lying-father-sons-story-fell-apart-police-dug-deeper/
R v Shaw - Leeds Crown Court (Prosecution 2023)
Prosecuted 'professional burglar' who was sentenced to 32 months imprisonment. https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/crime/career-criminal-rammed-police-car-as-he-drove-professional-burglary-team-around-leeds-4422603
R v Ndokajwas - Bradford Crown Court (Prosecution 2023)
Prosecuted man after cannabis farm worth £670k found. Marsel Ndokajwas was sentenced to two years imprisonment for the production of cannabis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-67571625
R v X - Youth Court (Defence 2023)
Fen defended in the Youth Court in a serious sexual assault trial.The trial involved child witnesses and implementing the s28 procedure. Fen made a successful submission of no case to answer, which prevented the need for the defendant to give evidence. https://www.broadwayhouse.co.uk/news/fen-greatley-hirsch-youth-court-2023
R v X - Leeds Crown Court (Defence 2023)
Fen Greatley-Hirsch Secures Suspended Sentence for his Client in a Serious Three-handed Affray. https://www.broadwayhouse.co.uk/news/fen-greatley-hirsch-secures-suspended-sentence
Clerks
